Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37173125›Full record

ArticleGut2023

Screening of normal endoscopic large bowel biopsies with interpretable graph learning: a retrospective study.

Simon Graham, Fayyaz Minhas, Mohsin Bilal, Mahmoud Ali, Yee Wah Tsang, Mark Eastwood, Noorul Wahab, Mostafa Jahanifar, Emily Hero, Katherine Dodd and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simon GrahamDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK n.m.rajpoot@warwick.ac.uk simon.graham@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2214-8212
Fayyaz MinhasDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9129-1189
Mohsin BilalDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8632-2729
Mahmoud AliDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7722-6196
Yee Wah TsangDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Mark EastwoodDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-7953
Noorul WahabDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1251-1559
Mostafa JahanifarDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-0460
Emily HeroDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-8263
Katherine DoddDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Harvir SahotaDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Shaobin WuDepartment of Pathology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK.
Wenqi LuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7838-0918
Ayesha AzamDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-8153
Ksenija BenesDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Mohammed NimirDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9409-6685
Katherine HewittDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6602-0141
Abhir BhaleraoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Andrew RobinsonDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Hesham EldalyDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Shan E Ahmed RazaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-1738
Kishore GopalakrishnanDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0459-6967
David SneadHistofy Ltd, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-9650
Nasir RajpootDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK n.m.rajpoot@warwick.ac.uk simon.graham@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4706-1308
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an interpretable artificial intelligence algorithm to rule out normal large bowel endoscopic biopsies, saving pathologist resources and helping with early diagnosis.

designA graph neural network was developed incorporating pathologist domain knowledge to classify 6591 whole-slides images (WSIs) of endoscopic large bowel biopsies from 3291 patients (approximately 54% female, 46% male) as normal or abnormal (non-neoplastic and neoplastic) using clinically driven interpretable features. One UK National Health Service (NHS) site was used for model training and internal validation. External validation was conducted on data from two other NHS sites and one Portuguese site.

resultsModel training and internal validation were performed on 5054 WSIs of 2080 patients resulting in an area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.98 (SD=0.004) and AUC-precision-recall (PR) of 0.98 (SD=0.003). The performance of the model, named Interpretable Gland-Graphs using a Neural Aggregator (IGUANA), was consistent in testing over 1537 WSIs of 1211 patients from three independent external datasets with mean AUC-ROC=0.97 (SD=0.007) and AUC-PR=0.97 (SD=0.005). At a high sensitivity threshold of 99%, the proposed model can reduce the number of normal slides to be reviewed by a pathologist by approximately 55%. IGUANA also provides an explainable output highlighting potential abnormalities in a WSI in the form of a heatmap as well as numerical values associating the model prediction with various histological features.

conclusionThe model achieved consistently high accuracy showing its potential in optimising increasingly scarce pathologist resources. Explainable predictions can guide pathologists in their diagnostic decision-making and help boost their confidence in the algorithm, paving the way for its future clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceState MedicineAlgorithmsBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studiescolonic adenomascolonic diseasescolorectal cancer screeningendoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37173125
PMCPMC10423541
OpenAlexW4376271489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.