ArticleGut2023
Screening of normal endoscopic large bowel biopsies with interpretable graph learning: a retrospective study.
Article in Gut, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agentic systems in computational pathology: architectures, evidence, and translational challenges.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence models: transforming early diagnosis and precise treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Confounding factors and biases abound when predicting molecular biomarkers from histological images.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Reliable classification of polyps based on artificial intelligence: a development and validation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Quantification-based explainable artificial intelligence for deep learning decisions: clustering and visualization of quantitative morphometric features in hepatocellular carcinoma discrimination.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- A pathologist-AI collaboration framework for enhancing diagnostic accuracies and efficiencies.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Bi-level graph learning unveils prognosis-relevant tumor microenvironment patterns in breast multiplexed digital pathology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Advances in Low-Dose Imaging and Enhancement-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A novel AI-based score for assessing the prognostic value of intra-epithelial lymphocytes in oral epithelial dysplasia.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Evaluating the pathological and clinical implications of errors made by an artificial intelligence colon biopsy screening tool.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Integrating computed tomography and biopsy images to predict chemotherapy response in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Understanding the errors made by artificial intelligence algorithms in histopathology in terms of patient impact.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- An interpretable machine learning system for colorectal cancer diagnosis from pathology slides.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an interpretable artificial intelligence algorithm to rule out normal large bowel endoscopic biopsies, saving pathologist resources and helping with early diagnosis.
designA graph neural network was developed incorporating pathologist domain knowledge to classify 6591 whole-slides images (WSIs) of endoscopic large bowel biopsies from 3291 patients (approximately 54% female, 46% male) as normal or abnormal (non-neoplastic and neoplastic) using clinically driven interpretable features. One UK National Health Service (NHS) site was used for model training and internal validation. External validation was conducted on data from two other NHS sites and one Portuguese site.
resultsModel training and internal validation were performed on 5054 WSIs of 2080 patients resulting in an area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.98 (SD=0.004) and AUC-precision-recall (PR) of 0.98 (SD=0.003). The performance of the model, named Interpretable Gland-Graphs using a Neural Aggregator (IGUANA), was consistent in testing over 1537 WSIs of 1211 patients from three independent external datasets with mean AUC-ROC=0.97 (SD=0.007) and AUC-PR=0.97 (SD=0.005). At a high sensitivity threshold of 99%, the proposed model can reduce the number of normal slides to be reviewed by a pathologist by approximately 55%. IGUANA also provides an explainable output highlighting potential abnormalities in a WSI in the form of a heatmap as well as numerical values associating the model prediction with various histological features.
conclusionThe model achieved consistently high accuracy showing its potential in optimising increasingly scarce pathologist resources. Explainable predictions can guide pathologists in their diagnostic decision-making and help boost their confidence in the algorithm, paving the way for its future clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.