Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37172000›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

The emergence of family medicine in India-A qualitative descriptive study.

Archna Gupta, Ramakrishna Prasad, Sunil Abraham, Nisanth Menon Nedungalaparambil, Onil Bhattacharyya, Megan Landes, Sanjeev Sridharan, Carolyn Steele Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Archna GuptaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-7609
Ramakrishna PrasadPMCH Restore Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sunil AbrahamDepartment of Family Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7703-1882
Nisanth Menon NedungalaparambilDepartment of Emergency Medicine, AIMS, Thrissur, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-8775
Onil BhattacharyyaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Megan LandesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sanjeev SridharanInstitute of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Carolyn Steele GrayInstitute of Health, Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countries globally are introducing family medicine to strengthen primary health care; however, for many, that process has been slow. Understanding the implementation of family medicine in a national context is complex but critical to uncovering what worked, the challenges faced, and how the process can be improved. This study explores how family medicine was implemented in India and how early cohort family physicians supported the field's emergence. In this qualitative descriptive study, we interviewed twenty family physicians who were among the first in India and recognized as pioneers. We used Rogers's Diffusion of Innovation Theory to describe and understand the roles of family physicians, as innovators and early adopters, in the process of implementation. Greenhalgh's Model of Diffusion in Service Organizations is applied to identify barriers and enablers to family medicine implementation. This research identifies multiple mechanisms by which pioneering family physicians supported the implementation of family medicine in India. They were innovators who developed the first family medicine training programs. They were early adopters willing to enter a new field and support spread as educators and mentors for future cohorts of family physicians. They were champions who developed professional organizations to bring together family physicians to learn from one another. They were advocates who pushed the medical community, governments, and policymakers to recognize family medicine's role in healthcare. Facilitators for implementation included the supportive environment of academic institutions and the development of family medicine professional organizations. Barriers to implementation included the lack of government support and awareness of the field by society, and tension with subspecialties. In India, the implementation of family medicine has primarily occurred through pioneering family physicians and supportive educational institutions. For family medicine to continue to grow and have the intended impacts on primary care, government and policymaker support are needed.

Identifiers

PMID37172000
PMCPMC10180658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.