Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171826›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Clinical and Urodynamic results of the Argus T® sling in moderate and severe male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy - a 5 year prospective study.

Adilson P Carvalho, André B Silva, Bruno R Lebani, Eduardo R Pinto, Mariana R Felipe, Milton Skaf, Marcia E Girotti, Stenio C Zequi, Carlos A R Sacomani, Fernando G Almeida

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A new option in the treatment of erectile dysfunction highligheted in International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adilson P CarvalhoDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
André B SilvaDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Bruno R LebaniDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Eduardo R PintoDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Mariana R FelipeDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Milton SkafDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcia E GirottiDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Stenio C ZequiServiço de Urologia Hospital do Câncer AC Camargo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Carlos A R SacomaniServiço de Urologia Hospital do Câncer AC Camargo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fernando G AlmeidaDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRAC Camargo Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSling as a therapeutic option for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been reviewed in the last two decades, as it is a relatively simpliest surgery compared to artificial urinary sphincter and has the ability to modulate urethral compression. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, rate of complications, quality of life and the effects on bladder emptying of the Argus T® compressive and ajustable sling in moderate and severe male SUI treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsMen eligible for stress urinary incontinence treatment after radical prostatectomy were recruited and prospectively evaluated, from March 2010 to November 2016. It was selected outpatient men with moderate and severe SUI, after 12 months of radical prostatectomy, who have failed conservative treatment. All patients had a complete clinical and urodynamic pre and post treatment evaluation, by means of clinical history, physical examination, urine culture, 1-hour pad test and ICIq-SF questionnaire. The UDS was performed after 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.

resultsThirty-seven men underwent sling surgery, 19 patients (51.4%) with moderate and 18 (48.6%) with severe SUI. The minimum follow-up time was 5 years. Overall, we had a success rate of 56.7% at 60 months follow-up. After surgery, we did not observe significant changes in the urodynamic parameters evaluated during the follow-up. No patient had urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) after sling implantation. Readjustment of the Argus T® sling was performed in 16 (41%) of the patients and 51% of the patients reported some adverse event.

conclusionWe demonstrate a long-term efficacy and safety of Sling Argus T® as an alternative to moderate and severe male SUI treatment. Furthermore, in our study bulbar urethra compression does not lead to bladder outlet obstruction.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary Bladder Neck ObstructionUrinary Incontinence, StressHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstatectomyQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUrodynamicsSuburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID37171826
PMCPMC10482448
OpenAlexW4376225523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.