ArticleJournal of vision2023
Qualitative perception of 3D shape from patterns of luminance curvature.
Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orientation fields predict human perception of 3D shape from shading.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Qualitative shape from shading.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new source of information is proposed for the perception of three-dimensional (3D) shape from shading that identifies surface concavities from the curvature of the luminance field. Two experiments measured the abilities of human observers to identify concavities on smoothly curved shaded surfaces depicted with several different patterns of illumination and several different material properties. Observers were required to identify any apparent concavities along designated cross sections of the depicted objects and to mark each concavity with an adjustable dot. To analyze the results, we computed both the surface curvature and the luminance curvature along each image cross section. The results revealed that most responses were in concave regions of the luminance profiles, although they were often shifted in phase relative to the curvature of the depicted surfaces. This pattern of performance was surprisingly robust over large changes in the pattern of illumination or surface material properties. Our analysis predicts that observers should make false alarm responses in regions where a luminance concavity does not correspond to a surface concavity, and our empirical results confirm that prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.