Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171798›Full record

SynthesisJAMA health forum2023

Association of Hospital Adoption of Probiotics With Outcomes Among Neonates With Very Low Birth Weight.

Leila Agha, Douglas Staiger, Christopher Brown, Roger F Soll, Jeffrey D Horbar, Erika M Edwards

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01825499 (Vermont Oxford Network Very Low Birth Weight Database of Infants <=1500 Grams or <=29 Weeks Gestational Age at Birth), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01825499 recruitingnot on this map

Vermont Oxford Network Very Low Birth Weight Database of Infants <=1500 Grams or <=29 Weeks Gestational Age at Birth

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorVermont Oxford NetworkRan1990 to 2040Enrolled60,000ConditionsNeonatologyArmsRegistry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants after the food and drug administration warning actions.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Inter-center variations in inpatient outcomes for infants with gastroschisis from the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Probiotics and the Risk of Infection.Clinics in perinatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leila AghaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Douglas StaigerDepartment of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Christopher BrownAEA Investors, New York, New York.
Roger F SollVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont.
Jeffrey D HorbarVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont.
Erika M EdwardsVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont.
University of Vermont · USDartmouth College · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: For neonates with very low birth weight (VLBW), randomized clinical trials (RCTs) indicate that probiotic treatment decreases the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), with smaller decreases in the risk of sepsis and death. There is little evidence on the rate of probiotic adoption in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and whether the benefits seen in trials have materialized in practice. Objective: To estimate changes in probiotic use among neonates with VLBW and to test whether neonates with VLBW treated at NICUs adopting routine probiotic use experience better outcomes compared with neonates treated at nonadopting NICUs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Vermont Oxford Network data on neonates with VLBW in US NICUs from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from January 2022 through February 2023. Exposure: Probiotics adoption vs nonadoption. Adopting NICUs were defined as those that currently or previously treated at least 20% of neonates with VLBW with probiotics. Main Outcomes: The primary outcomes were rates of NEC, in-hospital mortality, and sepsis, defined as bacterial or fungal infection occurring after day 3 from birth. A difference-in-differences analysis compared changes in VLBW infant outcomes between adopting and nonadopting NICUs before and after hospital-level adoption of probiotics. Additional analyses used the proportion of neonates treated with probiotics in each neonate's birth NICU and year. Results: The analysis included 307 905 neonates with VLBW (mean [SD] gestational age, 28.4 [2.9] weeks; 50.0% male) at 807 US hospitals. The rate of probiotic treatment of neonates with VLBW rose from 1572 of 38 296 neonates (4.1%) in 2012 to 4788 of 37 910 (12.6%) in 2019. Only 123 of 745 NICUs (16.5%) adopted probiotics by 2019, with 4591 of 6017 neonates with VLBW (76.3%) receiving probiotics in 2019 at adopting NICUs. Incidence of NEC declined by 18% at adopting NICUs (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95; P = .10) compared with nonadopting NICUs. Probiotic adoption was not associated with a significant reduction in sepsis (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.98-1.25; P = .09) or mortality (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80-1.08; P = .33). Conclusion and Relevance: In this cohort study, adoption of routine use of probiotics increased slowly in US NICUs and was associated with lower NEC risk but not with sepsis or mortality among neonates with VLBW. The findings for probiotic adoption and NEC, sepsis, and mortality were smaller than would have been predicted by the totality of RCT evidence but are consistent with a meta-analysis restricted to studies at low risk of bias.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingProbioticsSepsisAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMale

Identifiers

PMID37171798
PMCPMC10182437
OpenAlexW4376225898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.