Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171797›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2023

Health Care Use and Spending Among Need-Based Subgroups of Medicare Beneficiaries With Full Medicaid Benefits.

Brystana G Kaufman, Kelley A Jones, Melissa A Greiner, Abhigya Giri, Lucas Stewart, Amanda He, Amy G Clark, Donald H Taylor, M Kate Bundorf, Rebecca G Whitaker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brystana G KaufmanDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kelley A JonesPopulation Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Melissa A GreinerPopulation Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Abhigya GiriDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Lucas StewartDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Amanda HeDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Amy G ClarkPopulation Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Donald H TaylorDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
M Kate BundorfDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Rebecca G WhitakerDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Courtney H Van HoutvenDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Aparna HigginsDuke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Beneficiaries dual eligible for Medicare and Medicaid account for a disproportionate share of expenditures due to their complex care needs. Lack of coordination between payment programs creates misaligned incentives, resulting in higher costs, fragmented care, and poor health outcomes. Objective: To inform the design of integrated programs by describing the health care use and spending for need-based subgroups in North Carolina's full benefit, dual-eligible population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study using Medicare and North Carolina Medicaid 100% claims data (2014-2017) linked at the individual level included Medicare beneficiaries with full North Carolina Medicaid benefits. Data were analyzed between 2021 and 2022. Exposure: Need-based subgroups: community well, home- and community-based services (HCBS) users, nursing home (NH) residents, and intensive behavioral health (BH) users. Measures: Medicare and Medicaid utilization and spending per person-year (PPY). Results: The cohort (n = 333 240) comprised subgroups of community well (64.1%, n = 213 667), HCBS users (15.0%, n = 50 095), BH users (15.2%, n = 50 509), and NH residents (7.5%, n = 24 927). Overall, 61.1% reported female sex. The most common racial identities included Asian (1.8%), Black (36.1%), and White (58.7%). Combined spending for Medicare and Medicaid was $26 874 PPY, and the funding of care was split evenly between Medicare and Medicaid. Among need-based subgroups, combined spending was lowest among community well at $19 734 PPY with the lowest portion (38.5%) of spending contributed by Medicaid ($7605). Among NH residents, overall spending ($68 359) was highest, and the highest portion of spending contributed by Medicaid (70.1%). Key components of spending among HCBS users' combined total of $40 069 PPY were clinician services on carrier claims ($14 523) and outpatient facility services ($9012). Conclusions and relevance: Federal and state policy makers and administrators are developing strategies to integrate Medicare- and Medicaid-funded health care services to provide better care to the people enrolled in both programs. Substantial use of both Medicare- and Medicaid-funded services was found across all need-based subgroups, and the services contributing a high proportion of the total spending differed across subgroups. The diversity of health care use suggests a tailored approach to integration strategies with comprehensive set benefits that comprises Medicare and Medicaid services, including long-term services and supports, BH, palliative care, and social services.

Indexed as

MedicaidMedicareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansNorth CarolinaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37171797
PMCPMC10182424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.