ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2024
Efficacy of High-Altitude Biofilm-Forming Novel Bacillus subtilis Species as Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Zea mays L.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of Plant Growth Promotion Potential of Novel Compost-Derived Bacilli and Anticipating Their In Vivo Effectiveness Through Mathematical Modelling.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: dual roles in enhancing nutrition and mitigating climate-related abiotic stresses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Carrier-Based Application of Phyto-Benefic and Salt-TolerantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Metagenomic Analysis to Assess the Impact of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Peanut (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024Article
- Agro Active Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The Biotechnological Potential of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Isolated from Maize (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the global population explosion, the need for increasing crop productivity is reaching its peak. The significance of organic means of cultivation including biofertilizers and biopesticides is undeniable in this context. Over the last few decades, the use of rhizobacteria to induce crop productivity has gained particular interest of researchers. Of these, several Bacillus spp. have been known for their potential plant growth-promoting and phyto-pathogenic actions. Keeping this background in mind, this study was formulated with an aim to unravel the PGPR and phyto-pathogenic potency of Bacillus sp. isolated from extreme environmental conditions, viz. high-altitude waters of Ganges at Gangotri (Basin Extent Longitude Latitude-73° 2' to 89° 5' E 21° 6' to 31° 21' N). Based on recent studies showing the impact of biofilm on bacterial PGPR potency, three novel strains of Bacillus subtilis were isolated on basis of their extremely high biofilm-producing abilities (BRAM_G1: Accession Number MW006633; BRAM_G2: Accession Numbers MT998278-MT998280; BRAM_G3: Accession Number MT998617), and were tested for their PGPR properties like nutrient sequestration, growth hormone production (IAA, GA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.