Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171754›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2023

Effect of Intraoperative Infusion of Esketamine on Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jingyue Zhang, Fan Wang, Jingjing Dang, Huiwen Zheng, Baiqing Ren, Chao Liu, Ronghua Zuo, Rui Wang, Tianya Liu, Zhiping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jingyue ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Fan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Jingjing DangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Huiwen ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Baiqing RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Ronghua ZuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Tianya LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiping WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China. zhpsqxt@126.com.

Funding

China Primary Health Care Foundation YLGX-MZ-2022004Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation BK20221222Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission Medical Research Key Project K2019003National Natural Science Foundation of China 82270059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of esketamine on postoperative recovery quality after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

methodsPatients (n = 74) scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomly divided into two groups: the esketamine group (group E: 0.5 mg/kg/h infusion, i.e., 0.2 mL/kg/h) or the control group (group C: 0.2 mL/kg/h normal saline infusion). The infusions were stopped 20 min before the end of the procedure. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The secondary outcomes included QoR-40 scores on PODs 2 and 7, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on PODs 1, 2, and 7, time to extubation, additional postoperative analgesic use, length of hospital stay, and time to first exhaust. Additonally, the safety indices were also recorded, including hemodynamic profile, perioperative anesthesia index (Ai), utilization of vasoactive drugs or urapidil, and side effects.

resultsAll in all, 70 of the 74 patients completed the study, 35 in each group. The difference of QoR-40 scores on POD 1 was both statistically and clinically significant [difference 7.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.17, 9.25, p < 0.001]. The difference of QoR-40 on POD 2 was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (difference 4.81, 95% CI 2.69, 6.92, p < 0.001). The difference of NRS scores on POD 1 was statistically significant (difference -1.23, 95% CI -2.36, -0.10, p = 0.033). Compared with group C, group E had a lower utilization rate of phenylephrine and higher Ai values (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups on other measures.

conclusionContinuous ketamine infusion seems to be safe and well tolerated in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. It improved the quality of postoperative recovery and reduced pain on POD 1. In spite of the increased Ai value during the surgery, it also provided better hemodynamics with less usage of phenylephrine.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryEsketaminePostoperative painPostoperative recoveryQuality measuresQuality of Recovery-40

Identifiers

PMID37171754
PMCPMC10289955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.