Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171707›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023

Linguistic Analysis of Generic-Generic Drug Name Pairs Prone to Wrong-Drug Errors for which Tall-Man Lettering is Recommended.

Gail B Karet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gail B KaretSenior Scientist, American Medical Association, United States Adopted Names Program, Suite 39300, 330 N. Wabash Ave, Chicago, IL, 60611-5885, USA. gail.karet@ama-assn.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4323-159X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disseminated widely used lists of drug name pairs involved in wrong-drug errors, for which they recommended tall-man lettering (TML). Linguistic similarity is believed responsible for confusion of these drugs. This study aims to quantify linguistic similarity and other linguistic properties of these generic-generic name pairs.

methodsThe FDA's Phonetic and Orthographic Computer Analysis (POCA) software was used to generate numerical similarity scores for the generic-generic name pairs on these lists and to identify conflicts between these names and the names of other marketed products. Within each pair, differences in name length and the number of identical prefix (initial) letters and suffix (final) letters were determined.

resultsThe selected pairs shared a mean of 2.5 (± 1.8) identical prefix letters and 3.2 (± 2.9) identical suffix letters. The mean POCA score 69.5 (± 9.7), indicated moderate-to-high similarity. POCA scores for individual pairs ranged from 90 (most similar) to 46 (least similar). Individual names averaged 11.2 (± 9.1) high-similarity conflicts with names of other marketed drugs.

conclusionsPOCA analysis could be a valuable tool in determining whether linguistic similarity contributes to specific wrong-drug errors. The finding of 11.2 (± 9.1) high-similarity conflicts with names of other marketed drugs is more than for candidate names USAN accepts and suggests the names on the FDA and ISMP lists are linguistically problematic.

Indexed as

Drug LabelingDrugs, GenericEpoxy CompoundsHumansInosine MonophosphatePharmaceutical PreparationsPhoneticsThionucleotidesUnited States5'-deoxy-5'-thioinosine 5'-monophosphateDrugs, GenericEpoxy Compoundsethyl 2-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)pentyl)oxiran-2-carboxylateInosine MonophosphatePharmaceutical PreparationsThionucleotidesComputational linguisticsGeneric namesMedication errorsMixed case letteringTall-man letteringWrong-drug errors

Identifiers

PMID37171707
PMCPMC10276790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.