ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2024
Heterologous Expression of Plantaricin 423 and Mundticin ST4SA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acid-Mediated Antimicrobial Activity and Probiotic Potential of an SKS1-knockout Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Strain.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Fungal expression strategies for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Expression of Enterocin A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Bacterial contamination in starch-to-ethanol fermentations: Can bacteriocin-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae offer a solution?Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Unlocking the power of antimicrobial peptides: advances in production, optimization, and therapeutics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- The Progress of the Biotechnological Production of Class IIa Bacteriocins in Various Cell Factories and Its Future Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides or bacteriocins are excellent candidates for alternative antimicrobials, but high manufacturing costs limit their applications. Recombinant gene expression offers the potential to produce these peptides more cost-effectively at a larger scale. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a popular host for recombinant protein production, but with limited success reported on antimicrobial peptides. Individual recombinant S. cerevisiae strains were constructed to secrete two class IIa bacteriocins, plantaricin 423 (PlaX) and mundticin ST4SA (MunX). The native and codon-optimised variants of the plaA and munST4SA genes were cloned into episomal expression vectors containing either the S. cerevisiae alpha mating factor (MFα1) or the Trichoderma reesei xylanase 2 (XYNSEC) secretion signal sequences. The recombinant peptides retained their activity and stability, with the MFα1 secretion signal superior to the XYNSEC secretion signal for both bacteriocins. An eight-fold increase in activity against Listeria monocytogenes was observed for MunX after codon optimisation, but not for PlaX-producing strains. After HPLC-purification, the codon-optimised genes yielded 20.9 mg/L of MunX and 18.4 mg/L of PlaX, which displayed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 108.52 nM and 1.18 µM, respectively, against L. monocytogenes. The yields represent a marked improvement relative to an Escherichia coli expression system previously reported for PlaX and MunX. The results demonstrated that S. cerevisiae is a promising host for recombinant bacteriocin production that requires a simple purification process, but the efficacy is sensitive to codon usage and secretion signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.