Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171677›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2023

Colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome is burdensome and frequently delayed.

Elsa L S A van Liere, Imke L Jacobs, Evelien Dekker, Maarten A J M Jacobs, Nanne K H de Boer, Dewkoemar Ramsoekh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07360834 (Predicting Cancer Onset in Lynch Syndrome by Liquid Biopsies), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07360834 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Predicting Cancer Onset in Lynch Syndrome by Liquid Biopsies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNICANCERRan2026 to 2030Enrolled2,000ConditionsLynch SyndromeArmsINVITRO DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND COLONOSCOPY
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Patient-reported outcomes and measures applied in individuals undergoing colonoscopy surveillance for colorectal cancer: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elsa L S A van LiereDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. elsa.vanliere@amsterdamumc.nl.
Imke L JacobsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten A J M JacobsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanne K H de BoerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dewkoemar RamsoekhDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with Lynch syndrome have an increased colorectal cancer risk, hence, biennial colonoscopy surveillance is recommended. We aimed to investigate patients' perception and preferences regarding surveillance, and to further explore compliance behaviour. Individuals with Lynch syndrome received a validated survey evaluating experiences of their three most recent colonoscopies. Individuals were non-compliant to surveillance if the interval between colonoscopies differed ≥ 6 months from the recommended interval. In total, 197 of 291 (68%) invited individuals returned the survey. They mostly underwent colonoscopy biennially (99%), under mild sedation (79%) and with bowel preparation performed by Moviprep® (99%). Surveillance was perceived as impacting quality of life in 21%, and as moderately to extremely burdensome in 57%, particularly in those below age 40. To lower the burden, patients prioritised improvements in volume and taste of bowel preparation, laxation-related bowel movements, waiting times, and a more personal and respectful approach of endoscopic staff. Additionally, many individuals (60%) would favour less-invasive surveillance modalities such as biomarkers. In total, 28% of individuals had delayed colonoscopy surveillance, predominantly for patient-related reasons. An additional 10% considered quitting/postponing surveillance. Upon multivariable analysis, patient-related delay was associated with low and medium education, history of ≤ 4 colonoscopies and having no hospital recall-system. Colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome is often experienced as burdensome, and frequently delayed. We identified determinants of surveillance behaviour in this population, and present potential interventions to reduce the burden and non-compliance rates.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisAdultColonoscopyHumansQuality of LifeBiomarkerBurdenColonoscopyComplianceLynch syndromeSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37171677
PMCPMC10176312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.