Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171585›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Relative validity of the Planetary Health Diet Index by comparison with usual nutrient intakes, plasma food consumption biomarkers, and adherence to the Mediterranean diet among European adolescents: the HELENA study.

Leandro Teixeira Cacau, Giles T Hanley-Cook, Inge Huybrechts, Stefaan De Henauw, Mathilde Kersting, Marcela Gonzalez-Gross, Frederic Gottrand, Marika Ferrari, Esther Nova, Manuel J Castillo and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adherence to the EAT-Public health nutrition · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Leandro Teixeira CacauGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. lcacau@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-5960
Giles T Hanley-CookDepartment of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Inge HuybrechtsNutritional Epidemiology Group, Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Stefaan De HenauwDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Mathilde KerstingResearch Department of Child Nutrition, University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Marcela Gonzalez-GrossCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de La Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Frederic GottrandInstitute for Translational Research in Inflammation (INFINITE), University Lille, Lille, France.
Marika FerrariCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Center for Food and Nutrition, Rome, Italy.
Esther NovaDepartment of Metabolism and Nutrition, Institute of Food Science and Technology and Nutrition (ICTAN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Manuel J CastilloDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Dénes MolnárDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Kurt WidhalmDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Odysseas AndroutsosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Peter StehleDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Carl LachatDepartment of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirce Maria MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Luis A MorenoGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ghent University · BEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRCereal Research Centre · ITConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESHellenic Mediterranean University · GRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESLille Inflammation Research International Center · FRMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Pecs · HUUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe EAT-Lancet Commission proposed an evidence-based global reference diet to improve human health within planetary boundaries. Recently, the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was developed based on the EAT-Lancet recommendations and validated among Brazilian adults. However, the relative validity of the PHDI in adolescents has yet to be assessed. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the relative validity of the PHDI in European adolescents.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data from 1804 adolescents (12.5-17.5 years) enrolled in the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study. The PHDI (0-150 points) was calculated based on dietary intake data from two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls. Associations between the PHDI and usual nutrient intakes, plasma food consumption biomarkers, and adherence to the Mediterranean diet were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects linear regression models.

resultsHigher PHDI score was associated with greater intakes of nutrients predominantly from plant-source foods, such as vegetable protein, vitamin E, and folate and with lower intake of nutrients predominately from animal-source foods, such as total and saturated fat, cholesterol, and animal protein. Furthermore, a higher PHDI score was also positively associated with plasma β-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin D, folate, and ferritin concentrations, while negatively associated with trans-fatty acids concentration. Moreover, higher PHDI was related to a greater adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern.

conclusionsThe PHDI showed good relative validity among adolescents in the HELENA study. Hence, future research should assess adherence to the PHDI and long-term health outcomes.

Indexed as

Diet, MediterraneanAdolescentAnimalsBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesDietEatingFolic AcidHealthy LifestyleHumansBiomarkersFolic AcidBiomarkersDiet qualityEAT-Lancet dietRelative validitySustainable dietsUsual intake

Identifiers

PMID37171585
OpenAlexW4376225829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.