Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171540›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2023

Tick-tock, beat the clock: comparative analysis of disc diffusion testing with 6-, 10-, and 24-h growth for accelerated antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antimicrobial stewardship.

Jaya Biswas, Kavi Priya Appasami, Hitender Gautam, Sarita Mohapatra, Seema Sood, Benu Dhawan, Rama Chaudhry, Arti Kapil, Bimal Kumar Das

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The effectiveness of Sumbawa fermented mare's milk powder with gum arabic [Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaya BiswasDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kavi Priya AppasamiDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Hitender GautamDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. drhitender@gmail.com.
Sarita MohapatraDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Seema SoodDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Benu DhawanDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rama ChaudhryDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arti KapilDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bimal Kumar DasDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disc diffusion testing by Kirby-Bauer technique is the most used method for determining antimicrobial susceptibility in microbiological laboratories. The current guidelines by The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2022 specify using an 18- to 24-h growth for testing by disc diffusion. We aim to determine if using an early growth (6 h and 10 h) would produce comparable results, thus ultimately leading to reduced turnaround time. Six-hour, 10-h, and 24-h growths of 20 quality control strains and 6-h and 24-h growths of 48 clinical samples were used to perform disc diffusion testing using a panel of appropriate antimicrobial agents. Disc diffusion zone sizes were interpreted for all and comparative analyses were performed to determine categorical agreement, minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) according to CLSI guidelines. On comparing with the standard 24 h of incubation, disc diffusion from 6-h and 10-h growths of quality control strains showed 94.38% categorical agreement, 5.10% mE, 0.69% MEs, and no VMEs. Disc diffusion testing for the additional 40 clinical samples yielded a similarly high level of categorical agreement (98.15%) and mE, ME, and VME of 1.29%, 1.22%, and 0% respectively. Disc diffusion testing using early growth is a simple and accurate method for susceptibility testing that can reduce turnaround time and may prove to be critical for timely patient management.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial susceptibility testingEarly disc diffusion testingKirby-BauerRapid susceptibility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.