Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171491›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2023

Performance and clinical applicability of machine learning in liver computed tomography imaging: a systematic review.

Keyur Radiya, Henrik Lykke Joakimsen, Karl Øyvind Mikalsen, Eirik Kjus Aahlin, Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo, Kim Erlend Mortensen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keyur RadiyaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery at University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromso, Norway. keyur.radiya@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9573-6525
Henrik Lykke JoakimsenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Karl Øyvind MikalsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Eirik Kjus AahlinDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery at University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromso, Norway.
Rolv-Ole LindsetmoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Kim Erlend MortensenDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery at University Hospital of North Norway (UNN), Tromso, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMachine learning (ML) for medical imaging is emerging for several organs and image modalities. Our objectives were to provide clinicians with an overview of this field by answering the following questions: (1) How is ML applied in liver computed tomography (CT) imaging? (2) How well do ML systems perform in liver CT imaging? (3) What are the clinical applications of ML in liver CT imaging?

methodsA systematic review was carried out according to the guidelines from the PRISMA-P statement. The search string focused on studies containing content relating to artificial intelligence, liver, and computed tomography.

resultsOne hundred ninety-one studies were included in the study. ML was applied to CT liver imaging by image analysis without clinicians' intervention in majority of studies while in newer studies the fusion of ML method with clinical intervention have been identified. Several were documented to perform very accurately on reliable but small data. Most models identified were deep learning-based, mainly using convolutional neural networks. Potentially many clinical applications of ML to CT liver imaging have been identified through our review including liver and its lesion segmentation and classification, segmentation of vascular structure inside the liver, fibrosis and cirrhosis staging, metastasis prediction, and evaluation of chemotherapy.

conclusionSeveral studies attempted to provide transparent result of the model. To make the model convenient for a clinical application, prospective clinical validation studies are in urgent call. Computer scientists and engineers should seek to cooperate with health professionals to ensure this. KEY POINTS: • ML shows great potential for CT liver image tasks such as pixel-wise segmentation and classification of liver and liver lesions, fibrosis staging, metastasis prediction, and retrieval of relevant liver lesions from similar cases of other patients. • Despite presenting the result is not standardized, many studies have attempted to provide transparent results to interpret the machine learning method performance in the literature. • Prospective studies are in urgent call for clinical validation of ML method, preferably carried out by cooperation between clinicians and computer scientists.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLiver NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceLiver neoplasmsMachine learningRadiologyTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID37171491
PMCPMC10511359
OpenAlexW4376225300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.