ArticleBlood advances2023
High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: a multi-institutional retrospective study.
Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel devimistat results in complete remissions in heavily pretreated Burkitt lymphoma in a phase 2 trial.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for high-grade B-cell lymphoma in Japan: a single-institution analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Expression of Serum Adenosine Deaminase in Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes and Survival.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of TP53 mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- HGBL-NOS presenting as widespread extranodal disease without lymphadenopathy: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- High-grade B-cell lymphomas: high difficulties to diagnose and treat?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: an LLMPP study.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Novel Molecular Insights and Evolution of Less Toxic Therapeutic Strategies in Burkitt Lymphoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma gene expression signatures: Genomic analysis and potential therapeutics.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: CNS involvement and outcomes in a multi-institutional series.Blood advances · 2024Article
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, presenting as primary peritoneal lymphomatosis and successfully treated with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In this multi-institutional retrospective study, we examined the characteristics and outcomes of 160 patients with high-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBL-NOS)-a rare category defined by high-grade morphologic features and lack of MYC rearrangements with BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements ("double hit"). Our results show that HGBL-NOS tumors are heterogeneous: 83% of patients had a germinal center B-cell immunophenotype, 37% a dual-expressor immunophenotype (MYC and BCL2 expression), 28% MYC rearrangement, 13% BCL2 rearrangement, and 11% BCL6 rearrangement. Most patients presented with stage IV disease, a high serum lactate dehydrogenase, and other high-risk clinical factors. Most frequent first-line regimens included dose-adjusted cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide, with rituximab and prednisone (DA-EPOCH-R; 43%); rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP; 33%); or other intensive chemotherapy programs. We found no significant differences in the rates of complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) between these chemotherapy regimens. CR was attained by 69% of patients. PFS at 2 years was 55.2% and OS was 68.1%. In a multivariable model, the main prognostic factors for PFS and OS were poor performance status, lactate dehydrogenase >3 × upper limit of normal, and a dual-expressor immunophenotype. Age >60 years or presence of MYC rearrangement were not prognostic, but patients with TP53 alterations had a dismal PFS. Presence of MYC rearrangement was not predictive of better PFS in patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R vs R-CHOP. Improvements in the diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches beyond dose-intense chemotherapy are needed to overcome the unfavorable prognosis of patients with HGBL-NOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.