ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023
Development of an algorithm for finding pertussis episodes in a population-based electronic health record database.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pertussis risk assessment in children: a retrospective study of blood parameters from two medical centers.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
- Machine learning-based risk prediction model for pertussis in children: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a diagnostic prediction model for children with pertussis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Estimating the pertussis burden in adolescents and adults in the United States between 2007 and 2019.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines for adolescents and adults were licensed in 2005 and immunization strategies proposed, the burden of pertussis in this population remains under-recognized mainly due to atypical disease presentation, undermining efforts to optimize protection through vaccination. We developed a machine learning algorithm to identify undiagnosed/misdiagnosed pertussis episodes in patients diagnosed with acute respiratory disease (ARD) using signs, diseases and symptoms from clinician notes and demographic information within electronic health-care records (Optum Humedica repository [2007-2019]). We used two patient cohorts aged ≥11 years to develop the model: a positive pertussis cohort (4,515 episodes in 4,316 patients) and a negative pertussis (ARD) cohort (4,573,445 episodes and patients), defined using ICD 9/10 codes. To improve contrast between positive pertussis and negative pertussis (ARD) episodes, only episodes with ≥7 symptoms were selected. LightGBM was used as the machine learning model for pertussis episode identification. Model validity was determined using laboratory-confirmed pertussis positive and negative cohorts. Model explainability was obtained using the Shapley additive explanations method. The predictive performance was as follows: area under the precision-recall curve, 0.24 (SD, 7 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.