ReviewInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Promoting Access to Innovative Anticancer Medicines: A Review of Drug Price and National Reimbursement Negotiation in China.
Review in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China and the United States healthcare systems.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Pathing the way from regulatory approval to market access for gene therapy products (GTPs): An integrative review in the US, EU5, Japan and China.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness of first-line aumolertinib versus osimertinib for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cancer Medication Consumptions in Vietnam Between 2019 and 2023: An Analysis from the National Database.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Characteristics, accessibility and regional equity evaluation of pediatric medicines through National Drug Price Negotiation of China, 2017-2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of first-line osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus amivantamab plus lazertinib for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the US and China.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of six rounds of national drug price negotiation on availability, cost, use, and prices of targeted drugs in China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Survival analysis of time to reimbursement of novel medicines in five Eurasian countries.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of glofitamab versus rituximab for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- International price comparisons for national price-negotiated drugs in China: a cross-regional analysis.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin plus chemoimmunotherapy for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of changes in price, volume and expenditure of PD-1 drugs following the government reimbursement negotiation in China: a multiple-treatment period interrupted time series analysis.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib for US and Chinese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Analysis of nationwide availability of negotiated drugs in China's National Reimbursement Drug List.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Effect of the national reimbursement drug list negotiation policy on utilization of negotiated anticancer drugs in Chinese public hospital: a quasi-natural experiment.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Utilization and Determinants of Anticancer Drugs Under China's National Drug Price Negotiation Policy.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of dual-channel drug supply policy on nationally negotiated anti-tumor drugs in Xuzhou: based on interrupted time series analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The impact of the national reimbursement drug list negotiation policy on the accessibility and utilization of evolocumab and alirocumab in different levels of hospitals: an interrupted time series analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing universal access to high-cost medications like anticancer drugs is not an easy feat. Although basic medical insurance has covered over 95% of China's population since 2012, reimbursement for high-priced medicines is limited. In 2015, the Chinese government proposed establishing an open and transparent price negotiation mechanism for some patented and expensive drugs, where oncology was among the prioritized areas. In 2016, three drugs (gefitinib, icotinib, and tenofovir disoprox) underwent negotiation with the government, eventually reducing their prices by over 50% so that they could be prioritized during reimbursement processes. Focusing on anticancer medicines, this study comprehensively summarizes the progress in drug price and national reimbursement negotiation in China. Furthermore, we investigated the changes and development regarding negotiated anticancer medicines from quantity negotiated, classification, indication coverage, utilization, and procurement spending. Our findings could provide a reference for follow-up negotiations and reimbursement policies for high-value anticancer medications in other countries. From 2016 to 2021, 82 anticancer medicines were newly incorporated into the national reimbursement drug list (NRDL) via 6 rounds of negotiation. The majority of these were innovative pharmaceutics (ie, protein kinase inhibitors (28) and monoclonal antibodies (13)). Drug pricing and national reimbursement negotiation led to a marked decrease in prices and a sharp increase in the utilization of negotiated anticancer medicines. Following negotiations, the defined daily doses (DDDs) of innovative anticancer medicines experienced remarkable growth. Their proportion in total anticancer drugs DDDs also increased from 3.4% in 2014 to 20.9% in 2019. However, although drug prices decreased substantially after the negotiations, insurance spending still showed an upward trend owing to the significant increase in utilization. This calls for the government to carefully monitor the rational use of these expensive medicines and explore innovative payment models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.