Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171013›Full record

ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2024

Application of Platelet-Rich Plasma as a Stem Cell Treatment - an Attempt to Clarify a Common Public Misconception.

Ismail M Fareez, Fong Fong Liew, Darius Widera, Naiyareen Fareeza Mayeen, Jannatul Mawya, Noor Hayaty Abu Kasim, Nazmul Haque

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ismail M FareezSchool of Biology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Selangor, Malaysia.
Fong Fong LiewDepartment of Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Selangor, 42610, Malaysia.
Darius WideraStem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Group, School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Naiyareen Fareeza MayeenFaculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Planegg- Martinsried, 82152, Germany.
Jannatul MawyaTotiCell Limited, Dhaka, 1209, Bangladesh.
Noor Hayaty Abu KasimFaculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Nazmul HaqueTotiCell Limited, Dhaka, 1209, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the practice of regenerative medicine by health practitioners and direct-to-consumer businesses globally. Among different tools of regenerative medicine, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell-based therapies have received considerable attention. The use of PRP, in particular, has gained popularity due to its easy access, simple processing techniques, and regenerative potential. However, it is important to address a common misconception amongst the general public equating to PRP and stem cells due to the demonstrated efficacy of PRP in treating musculoskeletal and dermatological disorders. Notably, PRP promotes regeneration by providing growth factors or other paracrine factors only. Therefore, it cannot replenish or replace the lost cells in conditions where a large number of cells are required to regenerate tissues and/or organs. In such cases, cellbased therapies are the preferred option. Additionally, other tools of regenerative medicine, such as bioprinting, organoids, and mechanobiology also rely on stem cells for their success. Hence, healthcare and commercial entities offering direct-to-customer regenerative therapies should not mislead the public by claiming that the application of PRP is a stem cell-based therapy. Furthermore, it is important for regulatory bodies to strictly monitor these profit-driven entities to prevent them from providing unregulated regenerative treatments and services that claim a broad variety of benefits with little proof of efficacy, safety concerns, and obscure scientific justification.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsRegenerationWound HealingAdult stem cellsangiogenesisbioprintingembryonic stem cellsgrowth factorsinduced pluripotent stem cellsmesenchymal stem cellsregeneration.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.