Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170922›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2023

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic hand eczema with inadequate response or intolerance to alitretinoin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb proof-of-concept study.

Angelique N Voorberg, Esmé Kamphuis, Wietske A Christoffers, Marie L A Schuttelaar

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04512339 (Dupilumab in Severe Chronic Hand Eczema With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Alitretinoin), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04512339 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Dupilumab in Severe Chronic Hand Eczema With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Alitretinoin

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2020 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsHand EczemaArmsDupilumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Practical Approach to Chronic Hand Eczema.Dermatology and therapy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Chronic Hand Eczema.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Beyond Avoidance: Advanced Therapies for Contact Dermatitis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angelique N VoorbergDepartment of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-894X
Esmé KamphuisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-9634
Wietske A ChristoffersDepartment of Dermatology, Isala Dermatologic Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-3138
Marie L A SchuttelaarDepartment of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-4382
University Medical Center Groningen · NLIsala · NL

Funding

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective treatment options for patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE) are scarce. Dupilumab is licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and has shown promising results for the treatment of hand eczema in other studies.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with severe CHE (subtypes recurrent vesicular hand eczema or chronic fissured hand eczema) who have an inadequate response/intolerance to alitretinoin, or when alitretinoin is medically inadvisable.

methodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept phase IIb trial, patients with severe CHE were randomized 2 : 1 to dupilumab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Patients visited the outpatient clinic at the initiation of the study drug, and every 4 weeks until 16 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 75% improvement on the Hand Eczema Severity Index score (HECSI-75) at week 16. Adverse events were monitored during each visit. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04512339).

resultsIn total, 30 patients were randomized, and 29 patients received the assigned study drug (dupilumab n = 20, placebo n = 9). At week 16, more patients achieved HECSI-75 in the dupilumab group than in the placebo group {95% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1-99.7] vs. 33% [95% CI 9.0-69.1]}. Dupilumab also showed greater least square mean percentage change from baseline to week 16 in peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale compared with placebo [-66.5 ± 10.7 (95% CI -88.6 to -44.5) vs. -25.3 ± 17.0 (95% CI -60.1-9.4)]. Adverse events were similar for the dupilumab and placebo groups and were mostly mild. There were no serious adverse events, nor did any of the adverse events lead to discontinuation of the study drug.

conclusionsDupilumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to provide more evidence on the -efficacy of dupilumab in CHE. Moreover, larger studies could also enable comparisons between clinical subtypes or aetiological -diagnoses.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicEczemaAdultAlitretinoinAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAlitretinoinAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddupilumab

Identifiers

PMID37170922
PMCPMC13077220
OpenAlexW4376226207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.