Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170906›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Primary Care Team Perspectives on the Suitability of Telehealth Modality (Phone vs Video) at the Veterans Health Administration.

Shay Cannedy, Lucinda Leung, Tamar Wyte-Lake, Michelle D Balut, Aram Dobalian, Leonie Heyworth, Neil M Paige, Claudia Der-Martirosian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shay CannedyUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-4615
Lucinda LeungUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tamar Wyte-LakeUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-7701
Michelle D BalutUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2548-2283
Aram DobalianUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Leonie HeyworthVeterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Neil M PaigeUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Claudia Der-MartirosianUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-198X
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Improving Depression Management in Primary CareIK2HX002867 · VA · VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI LEUNG, LUCINDA B · 2020 to 2025
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTelehealth has the potential to improve access and timeliness of care, enabling primary care teams to deliver hybrid (virtual/in-person) services that will likely extend beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. To optimize its use and sustainability, it is imperative to understand how primary care teams perceive the suitability of telehealth services, including appropriate choice of mode (telephone or video). However, there is limited research on providers' decision-making processes surrounding telehealth use in primary care, including whether to use telephone or video, which this VA-focused study addresses. We examined how primary care (PC) team members determine whether to use telehealth and the mode of delivery, in the care of patients.

methodsQualitative case study that included 15 semi-structured interviews with employees who provided or supported telehealth care at primary care clinics at the Veterans Health Administration. We used a team-based rapid analysis approach to identify experiences using telehealth soon after COVID-19's emergence, consisting of the creation of structured summaries of each transcribed interview. The lead author then identified and compiled themes and sub-themes related to the suitability of telehealth in primary care, as well as associated quotes from transcripts. Resulting themes and quotes were reviewed and validated by 2 members of the project team.

resultsPrimary care team members considered several factors when assessing both the suitability of telehealth for appointments, and mode of use. They were largely guided by patient-related factors including patient preferences, specific health issues, and access to technology. Additional considerations centered on team members' personal preferences and factors that supported the wellbeing of the team, such as the flexibility to work from home (work-life balance) and protection from infection. Generally, participants viewed the option of both telephone and video telehealth modalities as useful tools in the care of patients although a few respondents emphasized its inferiority to in-person care.

conclusionsDetermining the suitability of telehealth services, including appropriate choice of mode is complex. Its suitability is tied to a variety of factors related to multilevel resources, preferences, and timing. When appropriate, telehealth should be considered a useful tool in the care of patients and for employee well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareTelephoneVeterans Healthaccess to careCOVIDprimary carequalitative methodstelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37170906
PMCPMC10184255
OpenAlexW4376225198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.