Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170864›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2023

Plant biochemical genetics in the multiomics era.

Saleh Alseekh, Esra Karakas, Feng Zhu, Micha Wijesingha Ahchige, Alisdair R Fernie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Saleh AlseekhMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2067-5235
Esra KarakasMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Feng ZhuNational R&D Center for Citrus Preservation, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070 Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9133-0843
Micha Wijesingha AhchigeMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3393-4224
Alisdair R FernieMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-335X
Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology · BGMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DEHuazhong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of plant biology has been revolutionized by modern genetics and biochemistry. However, biochemical genetics can be traced back to the foundation of Mendelian genetics; indeed, one of Mendel's milestone discoveries of seven characteristics of pea plants later came to be ascribed to a mutation in a starch branching enzyme. Here, we review both current and historical strategies for the elucidation of plant metabolic pathways and the genes that encode their component enzymes and regulators. We use this historical review to discuss a range of classical genetic phenomena including epistasis, canalization, and heterosis as viewed through the lens of contemporary high-throughput data obtained via the array of approaches currently adopted in multiomics studies.

Indexed as

MultiomicsPlantsMolecular BiologyMutationBiochemical geneticscanalizationepistasisGWASmetabolomicsQTL

Identifiers

PMID37170864
PMCPMC10433942
OpenAlexW4376223778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.