Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170717›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2023

A systematic dissection in oilseed rape provides insights into the genetic architecture and molecular mechanism of yield heterosis.

Jiang Ye, Huabing Liang, Xueyang Zhao, Na Li, Dongji Song, Jiepeng Zhan, Jing Liu, Xinfa Wang, Jinxing Tu, Rajeev Kumar Varshney and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A High-Thousand-Seed-Weight Mutant ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. FFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiang Ye *Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5734-761X
Huabing Liang *Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.
Xueyang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.
Na LiZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, The Laboratory of Melon Crops, Zhengzhou, China.
Dongji SongKey Laboratory for Molecular Genetic Mechanisms and Intervention Research on High Altitude Disease of Tibet Autonomous Region, School of Medicine, Xizang Minzu University, Xianyang, China.
Jiepeng ZhanOil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.
Jing LiuOil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.
Xinfa WangOil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.
Jinxing TuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-4526
Rajeev Kumar VarshneyState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Jiaqin ShiOil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-3401
Hanzhong WangOil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNHubei University · CNMurdoch University · AUShanghai Zhangjiang Laboratory · CNXizang Minzu University · CNZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosis refers to the better performance of cross progeny compared with inbred parents, and its utilization contributes greatly to agricultural production. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain heterosis mainly including dominance, over-dominance (or pseudo-overdominance) and epistasis. However, systematic dissection and verification of these hypotheses are rarely documented. Here, comparison of heterosis level across different traits showed that the strong heterosis of composite traits (such as yield) could be attributed to the multiplicative effects of moderate heterosis of component traits, whether at the genome or locus level. Yield heterosis was regulated by a complex trait-QTL network that was characterized by obvious centre-periphery structure, hub QTL, complex up/downstream and positive/negative feedback relationships. More importantly, we showed that better-parent heterosis on yield could be produced in a cross of two near-isogenic lines by the pyramiding and complementation of two major heterotic QTL showing partial-dominance on yield components. The causal gene (BnaA9.CYP78A9) of QC14 was identified, and its heterotic effect results from the heterozygous status of a CACTA-like transposable element in its upstream regulatory region, which led to partial dominance at expression and auxin levels, thus resulting in non-additive expression of downstream responsive genes involved in cell cycle and proliferation, eventually leading to the heterosis of cell number. Taken together, the results at the phenotypic, genetic and molecular levels were highly consistent, which demonstrated that the pyramiding effect of heterotic QTL and the multiplicative effect of individual component traits could well explain substantial parts of yield heterosis in oilseed rape. These results provide in-depth insights into the genetic architecture and molecular mechanism of yield heterosis.

Indexed as

Hybrid VigorQuantitative Trait LociChromosome MappingHeterozygotePhenotypedominance complementationgenetic architectureheterosismolecular mechanismpyramiding effectyield

Identifiers

PMID37170717
PMCPMC10281607
OpenAlexW4376225933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.