Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170515›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2023

Assessment of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the chicken digestive tract for potential use as poultry probiotics.

Merisa Sirisopapong, Takeshi Shimosato, Supattra Okrathok, Sutisa Khempaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dietary heat-killedVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of ProbioticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. The Role of ProbioticsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Draft genome assemblies of threemicroPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of Dead-CellAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. In vitro probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of Muscovy ducks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Merisa SirisopapongSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
Takeshi ShimosatoDepartment of Biomolecular Innovation, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Shinshu University, Kamiina, Nagano 399-4598, Japan.
Supattra OkrathokSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
Sutisa KhempakaSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
Suranaree University of Technology · THShinshu University · JP

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand SUT3-303-59-12-07National Science, Research and Innovation FundSuranaree University of TechnologyThailand Science Research and Innovation PHD/0105/2558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe use of probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics in animal feed has received considerable attention in recent decades. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have remarkable functional properties promoting host health and are major microorganisms for probiotic purposes. The aim of this study was to characterize LAB strains of the chicken digestive tract and to determine their functional properties for further use as potential probiotics in poultry.

methodsA total of 2,000 colonies were isolated from the ileum and cecal contents of the chickens based on their phenotypic profiles and followed by a preliminary detection for acid and bile tolerance. The selected 200 LAB isolates with exhibited well-tolerance in acid and bile conditions were then identified by sequencing the 16S rDNA gene, followed by acid and bile tolerance, antimicrobial activity, adhesion to epithelial cells and additional characteristics on the removal of cholesterol. Then, the two probiotic strains (L. ingluviei and L. salivarious) which showed the greatest advantage in vitro testing were selected to assess their efficacy in broiler chickens.

resultsIt was found that 200 LAB isolates that complied with all measurement criteria belonged to five strains, including L. acidophilus (63 colonies), L. ingluviei (2 colonies), L. reuteri (58 colonies), L. salivarius (72 colonies), and L. saerimneri (5 colonies). We found that the L. ingluviei and L. salivarius can increase the population of LAB and Bifidobacterium spp. while reducing Enterobacteria spp. and Escherichia coli in the cecal content of chickens. Additionally, increased concentrations of valeric acid and short chain fatty acids were also observed.

conclusionThis study indicates that all five Lactobacillus strains isolated from gut contents of chickens are safe and possess probiotic properties, especially L. ingluviei and L. salivarius. Future studies should evaluate the potential for growth improvement in broilers.

Indexed as

ChickenIsolationLactic Acid BacteriaLactobacillusProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID37170515
PMCPMC10330982
OpenAlexW4367852626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.