Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170512›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2023

Current technologies, regulation, and future perspective of animal product analogs - A review.

Seung Yun Lee, Da Young Lee, Jae Won Jeong, Jae Hyeon Kim, Seung Hyeon Yun, Ermie Jr Mariano, Juhyun Lee, Sungkwon Park, Cheorun Jo, Sun Jin Hur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seung Yun LeeDivision of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.
Da Young LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Jae Won JeongDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Jae Hyeon KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Seung Hyeon YunDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Ermie Jr MarianoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Juhyun LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Sungkwon ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.
Cheorun JoDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Sun Jin HurDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and ForestryMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 321028-5Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 322008-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the recent development of meat analog, industrialization, and the related legal changes worldwide. Summarizing the current status of the industrialization of meat analog, studies on plant-based meat, mycoprotein, and edible insects were mainly conducted to investigate their sensory properties (texture, taste, flavor, and color resembling meat), nutritional and safety evaluations, acquisition method of meat alternatives, and commercialization. Cultured meat is mainly studied for developing muscle satellite cell acquisition and support techniques or materials for the formation of structures. However, these technologies have not reached the level for active industrialization. Even though there are differences in the food categories and labeling between countries, it is common to cause confusion or to relay false information to consumers; therefore, it is important to provide accurate information. In this study, there were some differences in the food classification and food definition (labeling) contents for each country and state depending on the product shape or form, raw materials, and ingredients. Therefore, this study can provide information about the current research available on meat alternatives, improve regulation, and clarify laws related to the meat analog industry, which can potentially grow alongside the livestock industry.

Indexed as

Cultured MeatInsectLivestockMeat AnalogMycoproteinPlant-based

Identifiers

PMID37170512
PMCPMC10475384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.