Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170497›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2023

Individualized Concurrent Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage III-IVa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Definitive Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.

Pengjie Ji, Qiongjiao Lu, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yuebing Chen, Xiane Peng, Zhiwei Chen, Cheng Lin, Shaojun Lin, Jingfeng Zong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pengjie JiClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China.
Qiongjiao LuClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China.
Xiaoqiang ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China.
Yuebing ChenClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China.
Xiane PengKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
Zhiwei ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
Cheng LinClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China.
Shaojun LinClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China.
Jingfeng ZongClinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis retrospective study aimed to re-evaluate the effect of concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 498 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. The distribution of baseline characteristics was balanced using propensity score matching. Additionally, the results of NCT+IMRT and NCT+CCRT were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and differences in survival rates were analyzed using the log rank test.

resultsThere were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local progression-free survival (LRFS) between the two groups. Patients were further categorized into risk subgroups based on pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA cutoff values using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRFS between patients who received NCT+CCRT and NCT+IMRT in the high-risk group. In the low-risk group, although there were no differences between NCT+CCRT and NCT+IMRT in OS, PFS, and LRFS, patients who received NCT+CCRT had better DMFS than those who received NCT+IMRT.

conclusionPretreatment EBV DNA level can be used to individualize concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced NPC. Patients with low pretreatment EBV DNA levels may benefit from concurrent chemotherapy, whereas those with high levels may not. Other treatment modalities need to be explored for high-risk patients to improve their prognosis.

Indexed as

CarcinomaEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedChemoradiotherapyDNAHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesDNAChemoradiotherapyEpstein-Barr virus DNAIndividualized treatmentNasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37170497
PMCPMC10582526
OpenAlexW4376139120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.