Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170347›Full record

ArticleBMC zoology2021

Increased spatial resolution of sampling in the Carpathian basin helps to understand the phylogeny of central European stream-dwelling gudgeons.

Péter Takács, Árpád Ferincz, István Imecs, Balázs Kovács, András Attila Nagy, Katalin Ihász, Zoltán Vitál, Eszter Csoma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC zoology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Péter TakácsBalaton Limnological Institute, Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg Kuno str. 3, Tihany, H-8237, Hungary. takacs.peter@ecolres.hu.
Árpád FerinczDepartment of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly str. 1, Gödöllő, H-2103, Hungary.
István ImecsACCENT GeoEcological Organization, str. Ciucaș nr. 62/A, 535100, Băile Tușnad, Romania.
Balázs KovácsDepartment of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly str. 1, Gödöllő, H-2103, Hungary.
András Attila Nagy"MilvusGroup" Birdland Nature Protection Association, Crinului nr 22, 540343, Tîrgu Mureș, Romania.
Katalin IhászDepartment of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Institute of Aquaculture and Environmental Safety, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly str. 1, Gödöllő, H-2103, Hungary.
Zoltán VitálBalaton Limnological Institute, Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg Kuno str. 3, Tihany, H-8237, Hungary.
Eszter CsomaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUAccent Pro 2000 (Romania) · ROHUN-REN Balaton Limnological Research Institute · HUResearch Institute for Fisheries and Aquaculture · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

Bolyai Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences BO/00212/18/5Bolyai Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences BO/0022/18/8Collegium Talentum Programme of Hungary Collegium Talentum Programme of HungaryEuropean Union and the European Social Fund EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008Ministry of Human Capacities, Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program FEKUT2019 TUDFO/47138/2019-ITMMinistry of Innovation and Technology within the framework of the Thematic Excellence Programme 2020, National Challenges Subprogramme TKP2020-NKA-16National Research, Development and Innovation Office NKFIH-872National Research, Development and Innovation Office OTKA FK131426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhylogenetic studies of widespread European fish species often do not completely cover their entire distribution area, and some areas are often excluded from analyses than others. For example, Carpathian stocks are often omitted from these surveys or are under-represented in the samples. However, this area served as an extra-Mediterranean refugia for many species; therefore, it is assumed that fish stocks here may show special phylogenetic features. For this reason, increased spatial resolution of sampling, namely revealing genetic information from unexamined Carpathian areas within the range of doubtful taxa, may help us better understand their phylogenetic features. To test this hypothesis, a phylogenetic investigation using a partial mtCR sequence data was conducted on 56 stream-dwelling freshwater fish (Gobio spp.) individuals collected from 11 rivers of the data-deficient Southeastern Carpathian area. Moreover, we revieved the available phylogenetic data of Middle-Danubian stream-dwelling gudgeon lineages to delineate their distribution in the area.

resultsSeven out of the nine detected haplotypes were newly described, suggesting the studied area hosts distinct and diverse Gobio stocks. Two valid species (G. obtusirostris, G. gobio), and a haplogroup with doubtful phylogenetic position" G. sp. 1" were detected in the area, showing a specific spatial distribution pattern. The distribution of the detected lineages in the Middle-Danubian area correspond with recent and paleo hydrogeographic features, at the same time mainly on their bordering areas show considerable overlap.

conclusionsDespite the relatively limited geographic range of the study, our results provide important information which contributes to a better understanding of the phylogenetic, taxonomic and distribution features of Central European gudgeons. The genetically confirmed distribution data of the indicated lineages corresponds well with the recent and near-recent hydrogeographic features of the area, and assumes several hybrid zones in the Carpathian Basin. Additionally, the results show that the middle and lower Danubian watershed cannot be excluded from the range of G. gobio. Moreover, the" G. sp. 1", is slightly differentiated but phylogenetically distinct entity, and is the only Gobio taxa thus far detected in the middle and lower Tisza-basin. However, further investigations are necessary to clarify the taxonomic position of this group.

Indexed as

Carpathian basinCyprinidaeGobioIsolationSpeciation

Identifiers

PMID37170347
PMCPMC10127091
OpenAlexW3165654291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.