Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170294›Full record

ArticleBMC zoology2021

Perch time allocation and feeding efficiency of flycatching Rhinolophus formosae: an optimal foraging behavior?

Ya-Fu Lee, Yen-Min Kuo, Wen-Chen Chu, Yu-Hsiu Lin, Hsiang-Yi Chang, Hsing-Yi Chang, Wei-Ming Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC zoology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ya-Fu Lee *Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. yafulee@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Yen-Min Kuo *Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Wen-Chen ChuDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsiu LinDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Yi ChangDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Hsing-Yi ChangDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Wei-Ming ChenDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
National Cheng Kung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlycatching bats are species-rare and comprise predominantly horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae). Their hang-and-wait foraging mode and long constant-frequency echolocation calls offer advantages in energetics and prey detection, and may enable them apt to foraging optimally, yet not much is known about the foraging behavior of flycatching bats. Thus we assessed the perch use and foraging performance in the field by one of the largest horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus formosae, and offered insights on their perch time allocation.

resultsThe perching-foraging behaviors of the bats did not differ significantly between forest settings, but the residence and giving-up time, mean attack, and attack rate were higher in the late spring-early summer, whereas the mean capture, capture rate, and attack efficiency were lower in the late summer when volant juveniles joined the nocturnal activity. The bats maintained flycatching and exhibited largely similar attack rates through the night with peak residence time around the midnight, but the capture rate and attack efficiency both reduced toward midnight and then increased toward the hours right before dawn. The attack rate was negatively correlated to the number of perches used and perch switch; by contrast, the capture rate was positively correlated with both factors. The total residence time at a site increased but mean residence time per perch decreased as the number of perches used and perch-switch increased. The giving-up time was inversely correlated to the attack rate and attack efficiency, and decreased with an increasing capture rate.

conclusionsThe bats increased perch switch at lower attack rates in early spring, but switched less frequently in late spring and prime summer months when insect abundance is higher. By scanning through a broad angular range for prey detection, and switching more frequently among perches, R. formosae foraged with an increased capture rate, and were able to remain at the site longer by slightly reducing their mean residence time per perch. Our results concur with the predictions of optimal foraging theory for patch selection and offer implications for further exploration of the foraging behavior of flycatching horseshoe bats.

Indexed as

FlycatchingForagingForestsGiving-up timeHorseshoe batsPerch

Identifiers

PMID37170294
PMCPMC10127097
OpenAlexW3165503387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.