Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170217›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Low impact of polyploidization on the transcriptome of synthetic allohexaploid wheat.

Meriem Banouh, David Armisen, Annaig Bouguennec, Cécile Huneau, Mamadou Dia Sow, Caroline Pont, Jérôme Salse, Peter Civáň

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Investigating the dynamic responses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meriem Banouh *INRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France.
David Armisen *Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5242, 46 allée d'Italie, Lyon, 69364, France.
Annaig BouguennecINRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France.
Cécile HuneauINRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France.
Mamadou Dia SowINRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France.
Caroline PontINRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France.
Jérôme SalseINRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France.
Peter CiváňINRAE/UCA UMR 1095, 5 Chemin de Beaulieu, Clermont Ferrand, 63100, France. peter.civan@inrae.fr.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MA

Funding

Fonds de Soutien à l'Obtention Végétale PolyBléDInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement SeedEX, SeedENCODE, MethylWheat
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBread wheat is a recent allohexaploid (genomic constitution AABBDD) that emerged through a hybridization between tetraploid Triticum turgidum (AABB) and diploid Aegilops tauschii (DD) less than 10,000 years ago. The hexaploidization can be re-created artificially, producing synthetic wheat that has been used to study immediate genomic responses to polyploidization. The scale of the consequences of polyploidization, and their mechanism of establishment, remain uncertain.

resultsHere we sampled several synthetic wheats from alternative parental genotypes and reciprocal crosses, and examined transcriptomes from two different tissues and successive generations. We did not detect any massive reprogramming in gene expression, with only around 1% of expressed genes showing significant differences compared to their lower-ploidy parents. Most of this differential expression is located on the D subgenome, without consistency in the direction of the expression change. Homoeolog expression bias in synthetic wheat is similar to the pattern observed in the parents. Both differential expression and homoeolog bias are tissue-specific. While up to three families of transposable elements became upregulated in wheat synthetics, their position and distance are not significantly associated with expression changes in proximal genes. DISCUSSION: While only a few genes change their expression pattern after polyploidization, they can be involved in agronomically important pathways. Alternative parental combinations can lead to opposite changes on the same subset of D-located genes, which is relevant for harnessing new diversity in wheat breeding. Tissue specificity of the polyploidization-triggered expression changes indicates the remodelling of transcriptomes in synthetic wheat is plastic and likely caused by regulome interactions rather than permanent changes. We discuss the pitfalls of transcriptomic comparisons across ploidy levels that can inflate the de-regulation signal.

conclusionsTranscriptomic response to polyploidization in synthetic AABBDD wheat is modest and much lower than some previous estimates. Homoeolog expression bias in wheat allohexaploids is mostly attributed to parental legacy, with polyploidy having a mild balancing effect.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeTriticumGene Expression ProfilingGenome, PlantPlant BreedingPloidiesPolyploidyGenomic shockGrainLeavesRNA-seqTransposable elementsWhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID37170217
PMCPMC10173476
OpenAlexW4376226454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.