ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023
Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment-Based Recurrence of Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of the Literature as a Tool for More Informed Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Subsequent Obstetric Outcomes: Focus on Postpartum Hemorrhage and Predictive Factors.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Management and outcomes of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancies: a single-center retrospective case series.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward cesarean scar pregnancy among post-cesarean section women.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Treatment Outcomes of Excisional Versus Conservative Surgery for Endogenous Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
- Impact of Uterine Artery Embolization on Subsequent Fertility Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of 20 Years of Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Ectopic Intramural Isthmic Pregnancy: Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Ectopic Pregnancy on the Outcomes of the Subsequent Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean scar pregnancies over six years.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pregnancy outcomes and recurrence following surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value and efficacy evaluation value of transvaginal color doppler ultrasound parameters for uterine scar pregnancy and sub-type after cesarean section.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- [Reply to the letter to the Editor "Treatment of ectopic pregnancy implanted on cesarean scar: other therapeutic approaches"].Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2024Article
- The dyadic associations among self-efficacy, dyadic coping, and health-related quality of life between high-risk pregnant women and spouses: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Surgical treatment and reproductive outcomes in caesarean scar pregnancy at a single center.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) refers to the implantation and growth of the gestational sac at a uterine scarring site due to a previous cesarean section. The effects of CSP on subsequent fertility have emerged as a clinical issue of importance in gynecology and obstetrics in China owing to the increasing rate of cesarean section over the past 30 years in combination with the abolition of the national family planning policy, allowing for subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of CSP treatment on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes.
methodsThe study consecutively enrolled 499 women treated for CSP at Taizhou Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018. The study outcomes were the rate of secondary infertility and pregnancy outcomes. Clinical information was collected at the time of admission for CSP treatment. Information on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes was collected via telephonic follow-up.
resultsAmong the 499 women who met the inclusion criteria for CSP, 48 were lost to follow-up. Most women (74.9%, 338/451) did not express the desire for a subsequent pregnancy after CSP treatment. Among the 113 women who initially desired a subsequent pregnancy, 62 finally abandoned fertility plans. Among the 51 women who pursued pregnancy, 48 pregnancies were recorded in 43 women, infertility secondary to CSP treatment was identified in 15.7% (8/51) of women, and 60.8% (31/51) of women achieved full-term pregnancy, with placenta accreta spectrum identified in two women, one requiring a hysterectomy during cesarean section due to massive bleeding. Among the 16 women treated with uterine artery embolization combined with uterine aspiration and 18 women treated by ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with uterine aspiration, a successful full-term pregnancy rate of 68.8% (11/16) and 88.9% (16/18), respectively, was achieved. There were five cases of recurrent CSP among all 76 pregnancies (6.6%).
conclusionOver a long-term follow-up of women after CSP treatment, a high successful fertility rate was identified, with also an increased CSP recurrence rate. Uterine artery embolization combined with uterine aspiration and ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with uterine aspiration showed high rates of successful post-treatment fertility and pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.