Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170194›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Estimating transcriptome complexities across eukaryotes.

James E Titus-McQuillan, Adalena V Nanni, Lauren M McIntyre, Rebekah L Rogers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Re-evaluating evidence for giant genomes in amoebae.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James E Titus-McQuillanDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA. jmcquil2@uncc.edu.
Adalena V NanniDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Lauren M McIntyreDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Rebekah L RogersDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
University of Florida · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

New Genes and AdaptionR35GM133376 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI Rebekah Lee Rogers · 2019 to 2026
$2.4M
Allele Specific Regulation of Context Specific GRNR01GM128193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128193NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic complexity is a growing field of evolution, with case studies for comparative evolutionary analyses in model and emerging non-model systems. Understanding complexity and the functional components of the genome is an untapped wealth of knowledge ripe for exploration. With the "remarkable lack of correspondence" between genome size and complexity, there needs to be a way to quantify complexity across organisms. In this study, we use a set of complexity metrics that allow for evaluating changes in complexity using TranD.

resultsWe ascertain if complexity is increasing or decreasing across transcriptomes and at what structural level, as complexity varies. In this study, we define three metrics - TpG, EpT, and EpG- to quantify the transcriptome's complexity that encapsulates the dynamics of alternative splicing. Here we compare complexity metrics across 1) whole genome annotations, 2) a filtered subset of orthologs, and 3) novel genes to elucidate the impacts of orthologs and novel genes in transcript model analysis. Effective Exon Number (EEN) issued to compare the distribution of exon sizes within transcripts against random expectations of uniform exon placement. EEN accounts for differences in exon size, which is important because novel gene differences in complexity for orthologs and whole-transcriptome analyses are biased towards low-complexity genes with few exons and few alternative transcripts.

conclusionsWith our metric analyses, we are able to quantify changes in complexity across diverse lineages with greater precision and accuracy than previous cross-species comparisons under ortholog conditioning. These analyses represent a step toward whole-transcriptome analysis in the emerging field of non-model evolutionary genomics, with key insights for evolutionary inference of complexity changes on deep timescales across the tree of life. We suggest a means to quantify biases generated in ortholog calling and correct complexity analysis for lineage-specific effects. With these metrics, we directly assay the quantitative properties of newly formed lineage-specific genes as they lower complexity.

Indexed as

EukaryotaTranscriptomeAlternative SplicingEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGenomeGenomicsEffective exon numberEvolutionary ratesNovel genesOrthoDBOrthologsTranDTranscript modelTranscriptome complexity

Identifiers

PMID37170194
PMCPMC10173493
OpenAlexW4376223987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.