Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170185›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

BGWAS: Bayesian variable selection in linear mixed models with nonlocal priors for genome-wide association studies.

Jacob Williams, Shuangshuang Xu, Marco A R Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob WilliamsDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, USA. jwilliams@vt.edu.
Shuangshuang XuDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, USA.
Marco A R FerreiraDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, USA.

Funding

Subject CollectionU10AA008401 · NIAAA · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI JAY Arnold TISCHFIELD · 1989 to 2026
$162.7M
JH/CIDR Genotyping for Genome-Wide Association StudiesU01HG004438 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 2007 to 2011
$24.2M
The Collaborative Genetic Study of Nicotine DependenceP01CA089392 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2001 to 2012
$17.3M
Genome Wide Association Coordinating CenterU01HG004446 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEIR, BRUCE S. · 2007 to 2011
$6.6M
FAMILY STUDY OF COCAINE DEPENDENCER01DA013423 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA JEAN · 2000 to 2004
$2.2M
Study of Addiction: Genetics and EnvironmentU01HG004422 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
National Science Foundation DMS 1853549NCI NIH HHS P01 CA089392NHGRI NIH HHS HHSN268200782096CNHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004422NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004438NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004446NIAAA NIH HHS U10 AA008401NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) seek to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that cause observed phenotypes. However, with highly correlated SNPs, correlated observations, and the number of SNPs being two orders of magnitude larger than the number of observations, GWAS procedures often suffer from high false positive rates.

resultsWe propose BGWAS, a novel Bayesian variable selection method based on nonlocal priors for linear mixed models specifically tailored for genome-wide association studies. Our proposed method BGWAS uses a novel nonlocal prior for linear mixed models (LMMs). BGWAS has two steps: screening and model selection. The screening step scans through all the SNPs fitting one LMM for each SNP and then uses Bayesian false discovery control to select a set of candidate SNPs. After that, a model selection step searches through the space of LMMs that may have any number of SNPs from the candidate set. A simulation study shows that, when compared to popular GWAS procedures, BGWAS greatly reduces false positives while maintaining the same ability to detect true positive SNPs. We show the utility and flexibility of BGWAS with two case studies: a case study on salt stress in plants, and a case study on alcohol use disorder.

conclusionsBGWAS maintains and in some cases increases the recall of true SNPs while drastically lowering the number of false positives compared to popular SMA procedures.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBayes TheoremComputer SimulationLinear ModelsPhenotypeBayesianGWASModel selection

Identifiers

PMID37170185
PMCPMC10176706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.