Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170116›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

To what extent classic socio-economic determinants explain trends of anaemia in tribal and non-tribal women of reproductive age in India? Findings from four National Family Heath Surveys (1998-2021).

Jyoti Ghosal, Madhusmita Bal, Manoranjan Ranjit, Arundhuti Das, Manas Ranjan Behera, Sudhir Kumar Satpathy, Ambarish Dutta, Sanghamitra Pati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of Anemia in Reproductive-age Females (15-49 Years) from Indian Indigenous Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Pea (Nutrients · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jyoti GhosalSchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Madhusmita BalICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, India.
Manoranjan RanjitICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, India.
Arundhuti DasICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, India.
Manas Ranjan BeheraSchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sudhir Kumar SatpathySchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ambarish DuttaIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, India. ambarish.dutta@iiphb.org.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, India. drsanghamitra12@gmail.com.
Regional Medical Research Center · INKIIT University · INPublic Health Foundation of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite unprecedented socio-economic growth experienced by Indians in the past few decades, and a long history of anti-anaemia public health measures, prevalence of anaemia in Indian non-pregnant women of reproductive age group (NPWRA) has not declined. This warrants a firm understanding of what explains the anaemia situation over time, preferably by sub-populations. Therefore, we aimed to examine the trends of anaemia in tribal NPWRA (least privileged) and compare with the trends in the NPWRA of general caste (most privileged) between 1998 to 2021. Additionally, the study also explored explanation of any decline and tribal/general narrowing of these trends.

methodsWe studied four rounds of National Family Health Survey (1998-99, 2005-06, 2015-16, 2019-21). We examined the trend of anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dl) and its possible determinants in tribal and general NPWRA and estimated the portion of "decline" and "narrowing" that could be explained by the underlying and intermediate determinants (wealth, education, residence, parity and food security) using multiple logistic regression.

resultsThe distribution of determinants improved over 23 years in both the groups but more in tribals. But anaemia either remained unchanged or increased in both except 7.1 points decline in tribals between 2006-2016, leading also to 7 points narrowing of tribal/general gap. The modest attenuation of beta coefficients representing the change of anaemia prevalence (log of odds) in tribals from -0.314(-0.377, -0.251) to -0.242(-0.308, -0.176) after adjustment with determinants could explain only 23% of the decline. Similarly, only 7% of the narrowing of the tribal/general anaemia gap could be explained.

conclusionsThe structural determinants wealth, education, food security, parity and urban amenities improved immensely in India but anaemia did not decline in this 23-year period. This implies that the "usual suspects" - the structural determinants are not the main drivers of anaemia in the country. The main driver may be absolute and/or functional deficiency status of micronutrients including iron attributable to inadequate uptake and absorption of these elements from Indian diets; and therefore, their effects are noticeable in every socio-economic stratum of India. Future research for aetiologies and new interventions for anaemia alleviation in India may focus on these factors.

Indexed as

AnemiaFemaleHemoglobinsHumansIndiaParityPregnancyPrevalenceSocial ClassHemoglobinsAnaemiaIndiaNFHSTrendTribalsWomen of reproductive age group

Identifiers

PMID37170116
PMCPMC10172723
OpenAlexW4376225892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.