Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37169993›Full record

SynthesisSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2023

First dorsal interosseous muscle reconstruction: a systematic review of its attachments.

Zhi Xuan Low, Duncan Angus McGrouther

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhi Xuan LowDepartment of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. zhixuan987@gmail.com.
Duncan Angus McGroutherDepartment of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, when impaired due to traumatic injuries or degenerative conditions, can be reanimated in various ways to restore pinch grip. These reconstructive techniques are planned based on a precise anatomical understanding of the FDI muscle. However, a review of the existing literature has brought to light controversy regarding its insertions. A systematic review of these descriptions is presented to appreciate these variations.

methodsAn electronic database search without exclusion by publication year and language was performed according to the Checklist for Anatomical Reviews and Meta-Analyses (CARMA) guidelines, using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases. An assessment of the methodological quality was performed.

resultsThirteen studies were included in this article. There is general agreement that the FDI muscle contains two bellies and a bony insertion into the index finger proximal phalanx base. However, due to wide anatomic variation, differences were reported on whether there is a soft tissue insertion. When this was found, the included studies differed on how commonly this occurs (between 1.4% and 78%), where it inserts. Other sites of distal insertions reported include the metacarpophalangeal capsule, the interosseous hood and an assemblage nucleus on the volar plate.

conclusionsOur systematic review, focusing on the insertion of the FDI muscle, summarizes the existing knowledge on its anatomy and variations, thereby facilitating better understanding of its function and surgical planning for reconstruction.

Indexed as

Back MusclesHumansAnatomic variationHand injuriesMuscle developmentReconstructive surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.