ArticleScientific reports2023
Early detection of Solanum lycopersicum diseases from temporally-aggregated hyperspectral measurements using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperspectral imaging-based early stress and disease detection for sustainable crop management.Planta · 2026Review
- A machine-learning-powered spectral-dominant multimodal soft wearable system for long-term and early-stage diagnosis of plant stresses.Science advances · 2025Article
- Sugar management and photosynthesis of sugar beet after infection by Cercospora beticola.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing host-pathogen phenotyping dynamics: early detection of tomato bacterial diseases using hyperspectral point measurement and predictive modeling.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- An iterative noisy annotation correction model for robust plant disease detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some plant diseases can significantly reduce harvest, but their early detection in cultivation may prevent those consequential losses. Conventional methods of diagnosing plant diseases are based on visual observation of crops, but the symptoms of various diseases may be similar. It increases the difficulty of this task even for an experienced farmer and requires detailed examination based on invasive methods conducted in laboratory settings by qualified personnel. Therefore, modern agronomy requires the development of non-destructive crop diagnosis methods to accelerate the process of detecting plant infections with various pathogens. This research pathway is followed in this paper, and an approach for classifying selected Solanum lycopersicum diseases (anthracnose, bacterial speck, early blight, late blight and septoria leaf) from hyperspectral data captured on consecutive days post inoculation (DPI) is presented. The objective of that approach was to develop a technique for detecting infection in less than seven days after inoculation. The dataset used in this study included hyperspectral measurements of plants of two cultivars of S. lycopersicum: Benito and Polfast, which were infected with five different pathogens. Hyperspectral reflectance measurements were performed using a high-spectral-resolution field spectroradiometer (350-2500 nm range) and they were acquired for 63 days after inoculation, with particular emphasis put on the first 17 day-by-day measurements. Due to a significant data imbalance and low representation of measurements on some days, the collective datasets were elaborated by combining measurements from several days. The experimental results showed that machine learning techniques can offer accurate classification, and they indicated the practical utility of our approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.