Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37169587›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2023

Integrating Harm Reduction into Medical Care: Lessons from Three Models.

Ji Eun Chang, Zoe Lindenfeld, Holly Hagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji Eun ChangFrom the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (JEC, ZL); Department of Social Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (HH). ji.chang@nyu.edu.
Zoe LindenfeldFrom the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (JEC, ZL); Department of Social Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (HH).
Holly HaganFrom the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (JEC, ZL); Department of Social Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (HH).

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan, Courtney McKnight · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders (SUDs) are at a national high, with significant morbidity and mortality. Harm reduction, a public-health strategy aimed at reducing the negative consequences of a risky behavior without necessarily eliminating the behavior, represents a useful approach to engage patients with SUDs in care. The objective of this article is to describe how 3 medical practices operationalized harm reduction as a framework toward patient care and identify the common practices undertaken across these settings to integrate harm reduction and medical care.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using in-depth, semistructured interviews with 20 staff and providers at 3 integrated harm reduction and medical care sites across New York State from March to June 2021. Interview questions focused on how harm reduction approaches were implemented, how harm reduction philosophies were demonstrated in practice, and barriers to adoption.

resultsThe interviews resulted in 8 main themes of integrated harm reduction medical care: 1) role of provider as both learner and informer; 2) pragmatic measures of success; 3) collaborative and interdisciplinary care teams; 4) developing a stigma-free culture; 5) creating a comfortable and welcoming physical space; 6) low-threshold care with flexible scheduling; and; 7) reaching beyond the clinic to disseminate harm reduction orientation; and 8) creating robust referral networks to enhance transitions of care. These themes existed at the patient-provider level (#1 to 3), the organizational level (#4 to 6), and the level extending beyond the clinic (#7 to 8).

conclusionsAll 3 sites followed 8 common themes in delivering harm reduction-informed care, most of which are consistent with the broader movement toward patient-centered care. These practices demonstrate how medical providers may overcome some of the barriers imposed by the medical model and successfully integrate harm reduction as an orienting framework toward care delivery.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionSubstance-Related DisordersDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient CareQualitative ResearchAccess to Primary CareHarm ReductionNew YorkOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37169587
PMCPMC10636714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.