Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37169582›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Scale Space Calibrates Present and Subsequent Spatial Learning in Barnes Maze in Mice.

Yuto Tachiki, Yusuke Suzuki, Mutsumi Kurahashi, Keisuke Oki, Özgün Mavuk, Takuma Nakagawa, Shogo Ishihara, Yuichiro Gyoten, Akira Yamamoto, Itaru Imayoshi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yuto TachikiLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Yusuke SuzukiLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan suzuki.yusuke.7n@kyoto-u.ac.jp imayoshi.itaru.2n@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-4030
Mutsumi KurahashiLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Keisuke OkiLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Özgün MavukLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-2669
Takuma NakagawaLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Shogo IshiharaLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Yuichiro GyotenLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Akira YamamotoLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Itaru ImayoshiLaboratory of Brain Development and Regeneration, Division of Systemic Life Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan suzuki.yusuke.7n@kyoto-u.ac.jp imayoshi.itaru.2n@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals are capable of representing different scale spaces from smaller to larger ones. However, most laboratory animals live their life in a narrow range of scale spaces like homecages and experimental setups, making it hard to extrapolate the spatial representation and learning process in large scale spaces from those in conventional scale spaces. Here, we developed a 3-m diameter Barnes maze (BM3), then explored whether spatial learning in the Barnes maze (BM) is calibrated by scale spaces. Spatial learning in the BM3 was successfully established with a lower learning rate than that in a conventional 1-m diameter Barnes maze (BM1). Specifically, analysis of exploration strategies revealed that the mice in the BM3 persistently searched certain places throughout the learning, while such places were rapidly decreased in the BM1. These results suggest dedicated exploration strategies requiring more trial-and-errors and computational resources in the BM3 than in the BM1, leading to a divergence of spatial learning between the BM1 and the BM3. We then explored whether prior learning in one BM scale calibrates subsequent spatial learning in another BM scale, and found asymmetric facilitation such that the prior learning in the BM3 facilitated the subsequent BM1 learning, but not vice versa. Thus, scale space calibrates both the present and subsequent BM learning. This is the first study to demonstrate scale-dependent spatial learning in BM in mice. The couple of the BM1 and the BM3 would be a suitable system to seek how animals represent different scale spaces with underlying neural implementation.

Indexed as

MemorySpatial LearningAnimalsMaze LearningMiceBarnes mazemicescale spacespatial learningspatial navigationspatial representation

Identifiers

PMID37169582
PMCPMC10262649
OpenAlexW4376224212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.