Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37169080›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2023

The Role of Clinical Glyco(proteo)mics in Precision Medicine.

Yuri van der Burgt, Manfred Wuhrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Proteomics: A Promise Becoming Reality.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuri van der BurgtCenter for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: y.e.m.van_der_burgt@lumc.nl.
Manfred WuhrerCenter for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycoproteomics reveals site-specific O- and N-glycosylation that may influence protein properties including binding, activity, and half-life. The increasingly mature toolbox with glycomic and glycoproteomic strategies is applied for the development of biopharmaceuticals and the discovery and clinical evaluation of glycobiomarkers in various disease fields. Notwithstanding the contributions of glycoscience in identifying new drug targets, the current report is focused on the biomarker modality that is of interest for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. To this end, it is noted that the identification of biomarkers has received more attention than the corresponding quantification. Most analytical methods are very efficient in detecting large numbers of analytes, but developments to accurately quantify these have so far been limited. In this perspective, a parallel is made with earlier proposed tiers for protein quantification using mass spectrometry. Moreover, the foreseen reporting of multimarker readouts is discussed to describe an individual's health or disease state and their role in clinical decision-making. The potential of longitudinal sampling and monitoring of glycomic features for diagnosis and treatment monitoring is emphasized. Finally, different strategies that address the quantification of a multimarker panel are discussed.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineProteinsBiomarkersGlycomicsGlycosylationMass SpectrometryPolysaccharidesBiomarkersPolysaccharidesProteinsbiomarkerclinicaldiagnosisglycomicsglycoproteomicslab-developed testmultimarkerquantificationtherapy

Identifiers

PMID37169080
PMCPMC10326703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.