Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37169011›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2023

Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing.

Eric D Brooks, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Emma Vivers, Teena Burchianti, Xiaoying Liang, Lisa R Spiguel, Bharti Jasra, Nancy P Mendenhall, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Julie A Bradley

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer: clinical and dosimetric outcomes.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eric D BrooksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Raymond B Mailhot VegaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Emma ViversUniversity of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Teena BurchiantiUniversity of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Xiaoying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Lisa R SpiguelDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Bharti JasraDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Jacksonville College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Nancy P MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Oluwadamilola T OladeruDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Julie A BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · USUniversity of Florida Health · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment for bilateral breast cancer with radiation therapy is technically challenging. We evaluated the clinical and dosimetric outcomes of a small series of patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer, including a photon dosimetric comparison, to identify optimal treatment planning approaches. Materials and Methods: We reviewed a registry of patients (simultaneously) diagnosed with synchronous bilateral breast cancers who underwent postoperative definitive adjuvant proton therapy at our institution between 2012 and 2021. All patients were treated with double-scattered proton or pencil-beam scanning therapies. For comparison, intensity-modulated radiation therapy photon plans optimized for organ sparing and coverage were generated after treatment. Results: Six patients were included. The median patient age was 66 years; all were female with no history of breast cancer or radiation therapy. Two (33%) patients received breast/chest wall-only treatments, 1 (17%) required breast plus level I axillary treatment to one side and breast plus regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to the other, and 3 (50%) received bilateral breast/chest plus RNI; dosimetric results are reported for each group's median. Analysis showed clinical target coverage was comparable between proton and photon techniques (V95% of 96.4% with proton, 97.8% with photon). However, protons could deliver superior organ sparing at clinically relevant dose metrics for virtually all structures: a 6.7 Gy absolute reduction in the mean heart dose (7.5 Gy with photons to 0.7 Gy with protons), a 47% to 57% relative reduction in D Conclusions: Substantial dose reductions to multiple organs at risk while maintaining target coverage make proton the preferred modality for bilateral breast cancer treatment when available.

Indexed as

dosimetric analysisoncology outcomesparticle therapyradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37169011
PMCPMC10166012
OpenAlexW4323310430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.