Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168971›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Is the Routine Histopathologic Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis Based on Cross-cut Sections or on Well-oriented Sections?

Carlos Rubio, Corinna Lang-Schwarz, Michael Vieth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos RubioDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Corinna Lang-SchwarzInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Michael ViethInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Bayreuth Medical Center · DEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimFor many years, it was empirically estimated that the majority of the routine colon biopsies in Swedish patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), exhibited cross-cut crypts. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency of cross-cut crypts (CCC) and well-oriented crypts in routine colon biopsies in German patients with UC. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn total, 447 colon biopsies: 376 with UC and 71 controls were investigated.

resultsOut of 376 colon biopsies with UC, 73% exhibited ≥60% CCC. Out of the 237 biopsies showing ≥80% CCC, as many as 71% exhibited 100% CCC in individual biopsies. Similar percentages were found in control biopsies.

conclusionThe majority of the routine colon biopsies with UC, as well as control biopsies in German patients displayed CCC. Thus, an unnoticed, consequent, and systematic cutting technical hitch was introduced during the laboratory processing of colon biopsies. The reason(s) behind the similar histologic processing mode of colon biopsies at the two geographically disparate laboratories (Sweden and Germany) remains elusive. The cross-cutting mode influenced the narrative of biopsies in UC, inasmuch as some histological parameters listed among well-oriented colon sections were not present in sections displaying CCC.

Indexed as

Colon biopsiescross-cut cryptshistologyulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID37168971
PMCPMC10165380
OpenAlexW4367680183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.