Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168940›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2023

Extramural venous invasion: a novel magnetic resonance imaging biomarker for adverse pathology in bladder cancer.

Soroush Bazargani, Chandana Lall, Dheeraj Reddy Gopireddy, Shiguang Liu, Ashley Way, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Ahmed Elshafei, Allison Feibus, Seyed Behzad Jazayeri, Umar Muhammed Alam and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soroush BazarganiDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Chandana LallDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Dheeraj Reddy GopireddyDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Shiguang LiuDepartment of Pathology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Ashley WayDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Mohammed Al-ToubatDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Ahmed ElshafeiDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Allison FeibusDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Seyed Behzad JazayeriDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Umar Muhammed AlamDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Victor ChalfantDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Jatinder KumarDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Robert MarinoDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Joseph CostaDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Hariharan Palayapalayam GanapathiDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Shahriar KoochekpourDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Shiva GautamDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
K C BalajiDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Mark G BandykDepartment of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511, USA.
Jacksonville University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) recognized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an unequivocal biomarker for detecting adverse outcomes in rectal cancer: however it has not yet been explored in the area of bladder cancer. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of identifying EMVI findings on MRI in patients with bladder cancer and its avail in identifying adverse pathology. In this single-institution retrospective study, the MRI findings inclusive of EMVI was described in patients with bladder cancer that had available imaging between January 2018 and June 2020. Patient demographic and clinical information were retrieved from our electronic medical records system. Histopathologic features frequently associated with poor outcomes including lymphovascular invasion (LVI), variant histology, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and extravesical disease (EV) were compared to MRI-EMVI. A total of 38 patients were enrolled in the study, with a median age of 73 years (range 50-101), 76% were male and 23% were females. EMVI was identified in 23 (62%) patients. There was a significant association between EMVI and MIBC (OR = 5.30, CI = 1.11-25.36; P = 0.036), and extravesical disease (OR = 17.77, CI = 2.37-133; P = 0.005). We found a higher probability of presence of LVI and histologic variant in patients with EMVI. EMVI had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, 73%, 94% and 63% respectively in detecting extravesical disease. Our study suggests, EMVI may be a useful biomarker in bladder cancer imaging, is associated with adverse pathology, and could be potentially integrated in the standard of care with regards to MRI reporting systems. A larger study sample size is further warranted to assess feasibility and applicability.

Indexed as

Bladder cancercancer stagingextramural venous invasion (EMVI)histopathologyMRIprognosisVI-RADS

Identifiers

PMID37168940
PMCPMC10165227
OpenAlexW4376224607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.