Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168938›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2023

Three piece penile prosthesis salvage with chlorhexidine gluconate and length preservation: our technique and outcomes.

Shirin Razdan, Alexandra R Siegal, Kenan E Celtik, Rafael Carrion, Robert J Valenzuela

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. An update on penile prostheses: a narrative review.Asian journal of andrology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shirin RazdanDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY 10029, USA.
Alexandra R SiegalDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY 10029, USA.
Kenan E CeltikDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY 10029, USA.
Rafael CarrionDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine at University of South Florida Tampa, FL 33606, USA.
Robert J ValenzuelaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY 10029, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSince the advent of the Mulcahy technique of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) salvage, there have been multiple iterations of salvage prosthesis procedures reported in the literature. All of these techniques employ traditional antibiotic irrigation with or without rechanneling. We present our technique of salvage IPP using 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (Irrisept MATERIALS AND

methodsOur technique of IPP salvage begins with access via a 5 cm vertical midline scrotal incision. Dissection down to the corpora is performed with a combination of blunt dissection and dissection with fine tipped Metzenbaum scissors. Each component of the prior IPP is sequentially removed starting with the cylinders, followed by the pump, and finally the reservoir. Irrisept

resultsA total of four men with prior penoscrotal IPP placement underwent salvage IPP with MPP from January 2022 to October 2022. Median operative time was 165 minutes. Median preoperative cylinder size was 23.5 cm. Median postoperative malleable cylinder size was 23 cm. Median length of follow up was 4.8 months. There were no cases of MPP erosion or infection. Two patients elected to undergo repeat IPP insertion after 6 months with same cylinder size.

conclusionIPP salvage with chlorhexidine irrigation and soak as well as separate corporal channeling in a noninfected field for MPP insertion is a viable strategy for infected prostheses given the ease of performance, low risk of repeat infection of the malleable device, and maintenance of corporal length of any subsequent prostheses.

Indexed as

chlorhexidine gluconateErectile dysfunctioninfectioninflatable penile prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID37168938
PMCPMC10165229
OpenAlexW4376223743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.