Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168935›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2023

Robot-assisted versus conventional open kidney transplantation: a propensity matched comparison with median follow-up of 5 years.

Abhijit Patil, Arvind Ganpule, Abhishek Singh, Anshul Agrawal, Pratik Patel, Nitiraj Shete, Ravindra Sabnis, Mahesh Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Open Technique.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  9. Robotic kidney transplantation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024
    Review
  10. [Robot-assisted kidney transplantation-what is new?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abhijit PatilDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Arvind GanpuleDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Abhishek SinghDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Anshul AgrawalDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Pratik PatelDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Nitiraj SheteDepartment of Biostatistics, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Ravindra SabnisDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.
Mahesh DesaiDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital Nadiad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRAKT is a relatively newer approach for kidney transplant and has to be proven against the established approach, OKT. RAKT may be beneficial in obese patients as described in literature. Hence, we compared pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters with one year follow-up of both approaches by propensity matching similar characteristics patients.

methodsData of 28 OKT and 28 RAKT propensity matched patients was collected during 2014 to 2022 through the institutional transplant registry. OKT and RAKT patients were propensity matched for confounding factors like donor age, eGFR, side along with recipient age, BMI and comorbidities. All graft kidneys were harvested laparoscopically.

resultsBoth the groups were comparable in terms of recipient age and BMI, donor age, creatinine, BMI, eGFR and comorbidities. Total ischemia time (P<0.001) and postoperative day (POD) 1 creatinine (P<0.001) was significantly more in RAKT. However, postoperative 1 month (P=0.12), 3 months (P=0.60) and 1 year (P=0.10) creatinine was comparable in both approaches. Postoperative complications (P=0.90) including hemoglobin drop (P=0.72) were comparable in both the groups. The days to half the creatinine from preoperative values was significantly less in OKT group (P=0.009). Serum Tacrolimus levels at day 3 (P=0.08) and day 7 (P=0.112) were also comparable in both the groups. Graft survival was 78.5% in OKT group and 82.14% in RAKT group with median follow-up of 60 months in both the groups.

conclusionIn this comprehensive propensity matched analysis of RAKT with OKT, we conclude that RAKT has similar outcomes as OKT at 1 year and 5 years follow-up. CIT, TIT, time to half creatinine and POD 1 creatinine values were higher in RAKT group, but eventually have comparable outcomes at further follow-up. Thus, RAKT, a novel approach is non-inferior to established OKT approach. However, further larger trials are required.

Indexed as

OKTpropensity matchedRAKTsurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID37168935
PMCPMC10165225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.