ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2023
Robot-assisted versus conventional open kidney transplantation: a propensity matched comparison with median follow-up of 5 years.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between open and robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Early Experience With Robotic Kidney Transplantation With Left-Sided Graft Implantation: Technical Considerations and Short-Term Outcomes.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Efficacy of robot-assisted versus open kidney transplantation in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted donor and recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation: An umbrella review of clinical outcomes, surgical performance, and cost-effectiveness.World journal of transplantation · 2026Article
- National comparison of outcomes after robotic kidney transplantation and open kidney transplantation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The road to 100: single center experience with the first 100 consecutive robotic kidney transplants.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Initial experience with robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: A single-centre descriptive, retrospective study with technical modifications.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026Article
- Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Open Technique.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
- Robotic kidney transplantation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- [Robot-assisted kidney transplantation-what is new?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRAKT is a relatively newer approach for kidney transplant and has to be proven against the established approach, OKT. RAKT may be beneficial in obese patients as described in literature. Hence, we compared pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters with one year follow-up of both approaches by propensity matching similar characteristics patients.
methodsData of 28 OKT and 28 RAKT propensity matched patients was collected during 2014 to 2022 through the institutional transplant registry. OKT and RAKT patients were propensity matched for confounding factors like donor age, eGFR, side along with recipient age, BMI and comorbidities. All graft kidneys were harvested laparoscopically.
resultsBoth the groups were comparable in terms of recipient age and BMI, donor age, creatinine, BMI, eGFR and comorbidities. Total ischemia time (P<0.001) and postoperative day (POD) 1 creatinine (P<0.001) was significantly more in RAKT. However, postoperative 1 month (P=0.12), 3 months (P=0.60) and 1 year (P=0.10) creatinine was comparable in both approaches. Postoperative complications (P=0.90) including hemoglobin drop (P=0.72) were comparable in both the groups. The days to half the creatinine from preoperative values was significantly less in OKT group (P=0.009). Serum Tacrolimus levels at day 3 (P=0.08) and day 7 (P=0.112) were also comparable in both the groups. Graft survival was 78.5% in OKT group and 82.14% in RAKT group with median follow-up of 60 months in both the groups.
conclusionIn this comprehensive propensity matched analysis of RAKT with OKT, we conclude that RAKT has similar outcomes as OKT at 1 year and 5 years follow-up. CIT, TIT, time to half creatinine and POD 1 creatinine values were higher in RAKT group, but eventually have comparable outcomes at further follow-up. Thus, RAKT, a novel approach is non-inferior to established OKT approach. However, further larger trials are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37168935PMC10165225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.