Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168864›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Kidney allograft rejection is associated with an imbalance of B cells, regulatory T cells and differentiated CD28-CD8+ T cells: analysis of a cohort of 1095 graft biopsies.

Hoa Le Mai, Nicolas Degauque, Marine Lorent, Marie Rimbert, Karine Renaudin, Richard Danger, Clarisse Kerleau, Gaelle Tilly, Anaïs Vivet, Sabine Le Bot and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exhaustion of CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  6. Immune Landscape in Kidney Transplantation.Journal of inflammation research · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hoa Le MaiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Nicolas DegauqueCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Marine LorentCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Marie RimbertCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Karine RenaudinCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Richard DangerCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Clarisse KerleauCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Gaelle TillyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Anaïs VivetCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Sabine Le BotCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Florent DelbosEtablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Nantes, France.
Alexandre WalencikEtablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Nantes, France.
Magali GiralCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Sophie BrouardCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Unité mixte de recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut de Transplantation Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France.
Nantes Université · FRInserm · FRCenter for Research in Transplantation and Translational ImmunologyÉtablissement Français du Sang · FRCentre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes · FRInstitut de Transplantation Urologie en Nephrologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The human immune system contains cells with either effector/memory or regulatory functions. Besides the well-established CD4+CD25hiCD127lo regulatory T cells (Tregs), we and others have shown that B cells can also have regulatory functions since their frequency and number are increased in kidney graft tolerance and B cell depletion as induction therapy may lead to acute rejection. On the other hand, we have shown that CD28-CD8+ T cells represent a subpopulation with potent effector/memory functions. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that kidney allograft rejection may be linked to an imbalance of effector/memory and regulatory immune cells. Methods: Based on a large cohort of more than 1000 kidney graft biopsies with concomitant peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotyping, we investigated the association between kidney graft rejection and the percentage and absolute number of circulating B cells, Tregs, as well as the ratio of B cells to CD28-CD8+ T cells and the ratio of CD28-CD8+ T cells to Tregs. Kidney graft biopsies were interpreted according to the Banff classification and divided into 5 biopsies groups: 1) normal/subnormal, 2) interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy grade 2/3 (IFTA), 3) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), 4) T cell mediated-rejection (TCMR), and 5) borderline rejection. We compared group 1 with the other groups as well as with a combined group 3, 4, and 5 (rejection of all types) using multivariable linear mixed models. Results and discussion: We found that compared to normal/subnormal biopsies, rejection of all types was marginally associated with a decrease in the percentage of circulating B cells (p=0.06) and significantly associated with an increase in the ratio of CD28-CD8+ T cells to Tregs (p=0.01). Moreover, ABMR, TCMR (p=0.007), and rejection of all types (p=0.0003) were significantly associated with a decrease in the ratio of B cells to CD28-CD8+ T cells compared to normal/subnormal biopsies. Taken together, our results show that kidney allograft rejection is associated with an imbalance between immune cells with effector/memory functions and those with regulatory properties.

Indexed as

B-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAllograftsAntibodiesBiopsyCD28 AntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansKidneyAntibodiesCD28 AntigensB lymphocytesCD28-CD8+ T cellskidney transplantationrejectionTreg

Identifiers

PMID37168864
PMCPMC10164960
OpenAlexW4366828101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.