Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168823›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2023

Accuracy of the Pisiform Boost Test for the Diagnosis of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears in the Wrist - Pisiform Boost Test.

Lydia Robb, Philippa Rust

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia RobbDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland.
Philippa RustDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland.
NHS Tayside · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel examination technique, the 'Pisiform Boost Test,' in diagnosing a triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear. Methods: Wrist arthroscopies performed between 2011-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' clinical records were evaluated to determine the result of the Pisiform Boost Test during clinical examination and TFCC tear within the body of the TFCC as seen at wrist arthroscopy. The Pisiform Boost Test is performed by first assessing for ulna fovea pain on passive ulna deviation of the wrist and then assessing pain while the clinician applies digital pressure over the pisiform and passive ulna deviation. Results: The pisiform Boost test was found to have a Sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 81 - 97%) and a Specificity of 33% (95% CI, 14-59%) for the diagnosis of TFCC tears. Positive predictive value of 83%, a negative predictive value of 50%, and an accuracy of 78%. A chi-square test of independence was performed to examine the relation between a Positive Pisiform Boost Test and an arthroscopy-confirmed TFCC tear. The relation between these two variables was statistically significant, x2 (1, N = 82) = 6.4551, Conclusion: The Pisiform Boost Test demonstrates high sensitivity for TFCC tears (0.91). Specificity (0.33) is similar to that in the ulnar grinding test. Therefore, we propose this test be utilized with additional special tests for ulna-side wrist pain to allow clinicians to build a diagnostic picture, aiding decision-making and patient information.

Indexed as

Clinical examinationTriangular fibrocartilage complexWrist injuryWrist pathology

Identifiers

PMID37168823
PMCPMC10165677
OpenAlexW4376225694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.