ArticleBioinformation2022
Effectiveness of bilastine and fexofenadine among allergic Rhinitis patients in Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Article in Bioinformation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg versus Fexofenadine 180 mg for Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: Randomized Controlled Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis is a worldwide health problem which impairs quality of life and interferes with daily activities. Untreated allergic rhinitis also carries a significant financial burden for the society. Bilastine, a novel second-generation antihistaminic drug that is highly selective for the H1 histamine receptor, has a rapid onset and prolonged duration of action. Thus, the aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of bilastine and fexofenadine in treatment of allergic Rhinitis patients. 104 patients were enrolled who have fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study from the OPD of Ear, Nose and Throat Department. Patients were divided randomly in two groups A and B. Patients of group A were allowed to take tab Bilastine 20 mg OD whereas, patients of group B were allowed to take tab. Fexofenadine Hydrochloride 120 mg OD orally for two weeks. The baseline Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) were compared between two groups. The study findings showed that the mean TNSS was significantly reduced in our study group. Baseline TNSS was 13.55 and 13.45 in Group A and Group B respectively. Reduction in this parameter first become apparent in the 24 hours and maintained till 2nd week. Bilastine showed significant improvement in quality of life of Allergic rhinitis patients and proved to be more effective than fexofenadine in reducing the TNSS score, when used alone in allergic rhinitis patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.