Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168678›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2023

Adaptation memory in photoreceptors: different mechanisms in rods and cones.

Darya A Nikolaeva, Maria A Nekrasova, Alexander Yu Rotov, Luba A Astakhova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Darya A NikolaevaLaboratory of Evolution of the Sense Organs, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Maria A NekrasovaLaboratory of Evolution of the Sense Organs, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander Yu RotovLaboratory of Evolution of the Sense Organs, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Luba A AstakhovaLaboratory of Evolution of the Sense Organs, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry · RUL. A. Orbeli Institute of Physiology NAS RA · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate rods and cones operate over a wide range of ambient illumination, which is provided by light adaptation mechanisms regulating the sensitivity and speed of the phototransduction cascade. Three calcium-sensitive feedback loops are well established in both rods and cones: acceleration of the quenching of a light-activated visual pigment and cGMP synthesis by guanylate cyclase, and increased affinity of ion channels for cGMP. Accumulating evidence suggests that the molecular mechanisms of light adaptation are more complex. While investigating these putative mechanisms, we discovered a novel phenomenon, observing that the recovery of light sensitivity in rods after turning off non-saturating adaptive light can take tens of seconds. Moreover, after a formal return of the membrane current to the dark level, cell sensitivity to the stimuli remains decreased for a further 1-2 min. We termed this phenomenon of prolonged photoreceptor desensitization 'adaptation memory' (of previous illumination) and the current study is focused on its detailed investigation in rods and an attempt to find the same phenomenon in cones. In rods, we have explored the dependencies of this phenomenon on adapting conditions, specifically, the intensity and duration of adapting illumination. Additionally, we report that fish and frog red-sensitive cones possess similar features of adaptation memory, such as a drop in sensitivity just after the steps of bright light and slow sensitivity recovery. However, we have found that the rate of this process and its nature are not the same as in rods. Our results indicate that the nature of the temporary drop in the sensitivity in rods and cones after adapting steps of light is different. In the rods, adaptation memory could be attributed to the existence of long-lasting modifications of the components of the phototransduction cascade after adapting illumination. In cones, the observed form of the adaptation memory seems to be due to the sensitivity drop caused by a decrease in the availability of the visual pigment, that is, by bleaching.

Indexed as

adaptation memoryconedark adaptationlight adaptationphototransductionrod

Identifiers

PMID37168678
PMCPMC10165083
OpenAlexW4366827879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.