ReviewJPGN reports2022
Advances in Pediatric Diagnostic Endoscopy: A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in JPGN reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical indications and outcomes of pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a resource-limited healthcare system: Findings from the first multicenter study.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric gastroenterology: Diagnostic and therapeutic applications.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- A novel combined laparoscopic-endoscopic overstitch technique for pediatric gastric ulcer perforation: an innovative approach to repair of hollow viscus perforations.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- The role of confocal laser endomicroscopy in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Imaging and endoscopic tools in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: What's new?World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2024Review
- Role of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Early Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancy in High Risk Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric endoscopy has revolutionized the way we diagnose and treat gastrointestinal disorders in children. Technological advances in computer processing and imaging continue to affect endoscopic equipment and advance diagnostic tools for pediatric endoscopy. Although commonly used by adult gastroenterologists, modalities, such as endomicroscopy, image-enhanced endoscopy, and impedance planimetry, are not routinely used in pediatric gastroenterology. This state-of-the-art review describes advances in diagnostic modalities, including image-enhanced endoscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography, endo functional luminal imaging probes, wireless motility/pH capsule, wireless colon capsule endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and discusses the basic principles of each technology, including adult indications and pediatric applications, safety cost, and training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.