ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023
Propensity score-matched comparison of physical activity and quality of life between revision total hip arthroplasty and primary total hip arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Metal-backed or all-poly tibial components: which are better for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A propensity-score-matching retrospective study at the 5-year follow-up.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Studies on physical activity (PA) after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are limited. It is important to assess PA levels as well as improvements in physical function and pain after revision THA. The purpose of the study was to compare accelerometer-measured PA and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients 1-3 years after revision or primary THA. We also clarified the relationship between measured PA and HR-QoL. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 64 patients who underwent revision THA and 188 who underwent primary THA 1-3 years earlier. Outcome measures were accelerometer-measured light PA, moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA, number of steps, questionnaire-based Oxford hip score, SF-8 physical and mental component scores. We conducted propensity-score matching for age, sex, comorbidities, body mass index, and postoperative follow-up duration and compared PA levels and HR-QoL scores between patients after revision THA and primary THA of each 50 patients. Results: Based on propensity scores in the revision THA (68.3 years) and primary THA (67.8 years) groups, light PA, number of steps, and HR-QoL scores 1-3 years after revision THA were significantly lower than those after primary THA ( Conclusion: Increasing the time and frequency spent on light PA to the levels after primary THA may lead to an increase in overall PA levels after revision THA. A detailed understanding of PA, including light PA, in daily life and an approach that promotes activity levels are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.