ArticleAJOG global reports2023
First-trimester preeclampsia screening and prevention: impact on patient satisfaction and anxiety.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Clinical Outcomes Related to Preeclampsia: Real-World Impacts of Implementation of a Redesigned Approach to Antenatal Care-The Initial Maternity Assessment and Planning (IMAP) Service.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Motivation towards first trimester screening for preeclampsia among pregnant women in Denmark: A cross-sectional questionnaire study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreeclampsia affects between 2% and 5% of pregnant people in North America. First-trimester preeclampsia screening based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation risk calculation algorithm combined with treatment of high-risk patients with aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia more than the currently used risk factor-based screening. However, the impact of such screening on patient satisfaction and maternal anxiety is unknown.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the impact of first-trimester prediction and prevention of preterm preeclampsia on patient satisfaction and anxiety. STUDY
designConsenting pregnant patients participating in a local first-trimester (11-13+6 weeks) preterm preeclampsia screening and prevention implementation study
resultsBetween June 2021 and December 2021, surveys were emailed to 765 participants. The response rate was 47.80% (358/765). Overall, 93% of participants reported high levels of satisfaction with preterm preeclampsia screening (70%-100%), and 98% stated that they would recommend the screening to all pregnant patients. With respect to levels of satisfaction with the program's support in reducing feelings of worry and anxiety, 87.9% of the total sample reported high satisfaction (70%-100%). The level of clinically significant symptoms of anxiety did not differ significantly between low- and high-risk groups (8% vs 10.8%, respectively).
conclusionOverall, first-trimester preeclampsia screening was associated with high patient satisfaction and did not lead to differences in patient anxiety between those with high- and low-risk screen results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.