ArticleAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research2022
Development and initial testing of an active low-power, ferroelectric film-based bioaerosol sampler.
Article in Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This article introduces REAS (Rutgers Electrostatic Active Sampler), a new active bioaerosol sampler using permanently polarized ferroelectric film (e.g., PVDF) to capture charge-carrying bioaerosol particles. While REAS operates on an electrostatic collection principle, due to its unique materials and design, it does not require external power to charge incoming particles or to create an electrostatic collection field. The sampler consists of a polarized film wound in a spiral configuration with oppositely polarized film sides positioned 2.25 mm apart. The film and its holder are inserted into a 3D-printed housing cylinder to connect to a pump. The device has an open channel design, creating virtually no pressure drop, which allows for longer sampling times on the same battery charge compared to filter samplers. When REAS was tested in different field environments, the physical collection efficiency ranged from 19 ± 2% in a laboratory environment at 1 L/min to 41 ± 0.1% in residence at 0.1 L/min. When REAS was used to capture culturable bacteria and fungi over a 24-hr period, the concentrations determined by REAS were not different from those determined by an Institute of Medicine sampler (IOM, SKC, Inc.). The concentrations determined by both samplers were lower than those measured by a SAS Super 180 Sampler (SAS, Bioscience International), except for outdoor fungi. However, the SAS was used as a grab sampler to avoid overloading or desiccating the plates, while both REAS and IOM continuously sampled for 24 hrs. Further studies will explore improvements to the REAS sample elution protocols.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.